The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physiological properties of the normal lens
Abstract
The lens is an avascular organ suspended between the aqueous and vitreous humors of the eye. The cellular structure is symmetric about an axis passing through its anterior and posterior poles but asymmetric about a plane passing through its equator. Because of its asymmetric structure, the lens has historically been assumed to perform transport between the aqueous and vitreous humors. Indeed, when anterior and posterior surfaces were isolated in an Ussing chamber, a translens current was measured. However, in the eye, the two surfaces are not isolated. The vibrating probe technique showed the current densities at the surface of a free-standing lens were surprisingly large, about an order of magnitude greater than measured in an Ussing chamber, and were not directed across the lens. Rather, they were inward in the region of either anterior or posterior pole and outward at the equator. This circulating current is the most dramatic physiological property of a normal lens. We believe it is essential to maintain clarity; hence, this review focuses on factors likely to drive and direct it. We review properties and spatial distribution of lens Na+/K+ pumps, ion channels, and gap junctions. Based on these data, we propose a model in which the difference in electromotive potential of surface versus interior cell membranes drives the current, whereas the distribution of gap junctions directs the current in the observed pattern. Although this model is clearly too simple, it appears to quantitatively predict observed currents. However, the model also predicts fluid will move in the same pattern as ionic current. We therefore speculate that the physiological role of the current is to create an internal circulatory system for the avascular lens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electromagnetic effects—From cell biology to medicine
Funk, R. H. W., Monsees, T., & Özkucur, N. (2009) · Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.proghi.2008.07.001 · Cited by 423
Targeted Ablation of Connexin50 in Mice Results in Microphthalmia and Zonular Pulverulent Cataracts
White, T. W., Goodenough, D. A., & Paul, D. L. (1998) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.143.3.815 · Cited by 358
Two-Photon Microscopy: Shedding Light on the Chemistry of Vision
Imanishi, Y., Lodowski, K. H., & Koutalos, Y. (2007) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi701055g · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathias, R. T., Rae, J. L., & Baldo, G. J.
- Venue
- Physiological Reviews
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-50
- ISSN
- 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1210
- OpenAlex
- W2168734089
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological properties of the normal lens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/physrev.1997.77.1.21
- The paper
- Mathias, R. T., Rae, J. L., & Baldo, G. J. (1997). Physiological properties of the normal lens. Physiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1997.77.1.21
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.