The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chronic Pain in Canada ‐ Prevalence, Treatment, Impact and the Role of Opioid Analgesia
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence, treatment and impact of chronic pain in Canada. METHODS: A stratified random sample of 2012 adult Canadians (weighted by sex, age and region according to 1996 census data) was surveyed by telephone in 2001 to determine the prevalence of chronic pain, defined as continuous or intermittent pain for at least six months. A second sample of 340 chronic pain sufferers who were taking prescription medication for their pain was studied in detail to determine current therapeutic approaches and to assess the social and economic impact of chronic pain. RESULTS: Chronic noncancer pain was reported by 29% of the respondents, with increased frequency in women and older age groups. The average duration of pain was 10.7 years and the average intensity was 6.3 (on a scale from 1 to 10), with 80% reporting moderate or severe pain. Anti‐inflammatory agents were prescribed for 49% of respondents and opioid analgesics were prescribed for 22% (two‐thirds of these were codeine). Almost 70% were worried about addiction potential, and one‐third felt that strong analgesics should be reserved for terminal illnesses. Almost one‐half were unable to attend social and family events, and the mean number of days absent from work in the past year due to chronic pain was 9.3. INTERPRETATION: Chronic noncancer pain is common in Canadian adults and has a major social and economic impact. Despite growing evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of major opioid analgesics for chronic noncancer pain, less than 10% of chronic pain patients taking prescription medication were treated with a major opioid. Chronic pain is undertreated in Canada, and major opioid analgesics are probably underutilized in the management of moderate to severe pain as part of a multidisciplinary treatment program.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment
Breivik, H., Collett, B., Ventafridda, V., Cohen, R., & Gallacher, D. (2006) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009 · Cited by 5,486
The prevalence of chronic pain in United States adults: Results of an Internet-based survey
Johannes, C. B., Le, T. K., Zhou, X., Johnston, J. A., & Dworkin, R. H. (2010) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2010.07.002 · Cited by 1,252
Opioid Epidemic in the United States
Manchikanti, L. (2012) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2012/15/es9 · Cited by 1,180
A review of chronic pain impact on patients, their social environment and the health care system
Duenas, M., Ojeda, B., Salazar, A., Mico, J. A., & Failde, I. (2016) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s105892 · Cited by 985
“Indeed, it has been reported that half of the patients in pain indicated that their condition had prevented them from attending social or family events, 47 and similarly, almost half of the individuals with pain symptoms had less contact with their family.”
BackgroundComprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Scope, and Impact of Spinal Pain
Manchikanti, L. (2009) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2009/12/e35 · Cited by 721
Metadata
- Authors
- Moulin, D. E., Clark, A. J., Speechley, M., & Morley-Forster, P. K.
- Venue
- Pain Research and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 179-184
- ISSN
- 1203-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1918-1523
- OpenAlex
- W149541698
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic Pain in Canada ‐ Prevalence, Treatment, Impact and the Role of Opioid Analgesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2002/323085
- The paper
- Moulin, D. E., Clark, A. J., Speechley, M., & Morley-Forster, P. K. (2002). Chronic Pain in Canada ‐ Prevalence, Treatment, Impact and the Role of Opioid Analgesia. Pain Research and Management. https://doi.org/10.1155/2002/323085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.