Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 443

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chronic Pain in Canada ‐ Prevalence, Treatment, Impact and the Role of Opioid Analgesia

Open access
Moulin, Dwight E, Clark, Alexander J, Speechley, Mark, Morley-Forster, Patricia K·2002·Pain Research and Management

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence, treatment and impact of chronic pain in Canada. METHODS: A stratified random sample of 2012 adult Canadians (weighted by sex, age and region according to 1996 census data) was surveyed by telephone in 2001 to determine the prevalence of chronic pain, defined as continuous or intermittent pain for at least six months. A second sample of 340 chronic pain sufferers who were taking prescription medication for their pain was studied in detail to determine current therapeutic approaches and to assess the social and economic impact of chronic pain. RESULTS: Chronic noncancer pain was reported by 29% of the respondents, with increased frequency in women and older age groups. The average duration of pain was 10.7 years and the average intensity was 6.3 (on a scale from 1 to 10), with 80% reporting moderate or severe pain. Anti‐inflammatory agents were prescribed for 49% of respondents and opioid analgesics were prescribed for 22% (two‐thirds of these were codeine). Almost 70% were worried about addiction potential, and one‐third felt that strong analgesics should be reserved for terminal illnesses. Almost one‐half were unable to attend social and family events, and the mean number of days absent from work in the past year due to chronic pain was 9.3. INTERPRETATION: Chronic noncancer pain is common in Canadian adults and has a major social and economic impact. Despite growing evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of major opioid analgesics for chronic noncancer pain, less than 10% of chronic pain patients taking prescription medication were treated with a major opioid. Chronic pain is undertreated in Canada, and major opioid analgesics are probably underutilized in the management of moderate to severe pain as part of a multidisciplinary treatment program.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2002/323085

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 443

Metadata

Authors
Moulin, D. E., Clark, A. J., Speechley, M., & Morley-Forster, P. K.
Venue
Pain Research and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
179-184
ISSN
  • 1203-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1523
OpenAlex
W149541698
Cited by
443
References
0
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic Pain in Canada ‐ Prevalence, Treatment, Impact and the Role of Opioid Analgesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2002/323085
The paper
Moulin, D. E., Clark, A. J., Speechley, M., & Morley-Forster, P. K. (2002). Chronic Pain in Canada ‐ Prevalence, Treatment, Impact and the Role of Opioid Analgesia. Pain Research and Management. https://doi.org/10.1155/2002/323085

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.