The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pegasus: A Framework for Mapping Complex Scientific Workflows onto Distributed Systems
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the Pegasus framework that can be used to map complex scientific workflows onto distributed resources. Pegasus enables users to represent the workflows at an abstract level without needing to worry about the particulars of the target execution systems. The paper describes general issues in mapping applications and the functionality of Pegasus. We present the results of improving application performance through workflow restructuring which clusters multiple tasks in a workflow into single entities. A real‐life astronomy application is used as the basis for the study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why and Where: A Characterization of Data Provenance
Buneman, P., Khanna, S., & Wang-Chiew, T. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44503-x_20 · Cited by 1,334
Cited by
KBase: The United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase
(2018) · doi:10.1038/nbt.4163 · Cited by 1,624
Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research
Sandve, G. K., Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J., & Hovig, E. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003285 · Cited by 880
Characterizing and profiling scientific workflows
Juve, G., Chervenak, A., Deelman, E., Bharathi, S., Mehta, G., & Vahi, K. (2013) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2012.08.015 · Cited by 788
Self-citationExamining the Challenges of Scientific Workflows
Gil, Y., Deelman, E., Ellisman, M., Fahringer, T., Fox, G., Gannon, D., Goble, C., Livny, M., Moreau, L., & Myers, J. (2007) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2007.421 · Cited by 518
Self-citationThe design and realisation of the Virtual Research Environment for social sharing of workflows
De Roure, D., Goble, C., & Stevens, R. (2009) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2008.06.010 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Deelman, E., Singh, G., Su, M.-H., Blythe, J., Gil, Y., Kesselman, C., Mehta, G., Vahi, K., Berriman, G. B., Good, J., Laity, A., Jacob, J. C., & Katz, D. S.
- Venue
- Scientific Programming
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 219-237
- ISSN
- 1058-9244 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-919X
- OpenAlex
- W2129666400
- Cited by
- 1,222
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 59.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pegasus: A Framework for Mapping Complex Scientific Workflows onto Distributed Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2005/128026
- The paper
- Deelman, E., Singh, G., Su, M.-H., Blythe, J., Gil, Y., Kesselman, C., Mehta, G., Vahi, K., Berriman, G. B., Good, J., Laity, A., Jacob, J. C., & Katz, D. S. (2005). Pegasus: A Framework for Mapping Complex Scientific Workflows onto Distributed Systems. Scientific Programming. https://doi.org/10.1155/2005/128026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
