The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Children’s Self‐Reports of Pain Intensity: Scale Selection, Limitations and Interpretation
Open accessAbstract
Most children aged five years and older can provide meaningful self‐reports of pain intensity if they are provided with age‐appropriate tools and training. Self‐reports of pain intensity are an oversimplification of the complexity of the experience of pain, but one that is necessary to evaluate and titrate pain‐relieving treatments. There are many sources of bias and error in self‐reports of pain, so ratings need to be interpreted in light of information from other sources such as direct observation of behaviour, knowledge of the circumstances of the pain and parents’ reports. The pain intensity scales most commonly used with children – faces scales, numerical rating scales, visual analogue scales and others – are briefly introduced. The selection, limitations and interpretation of self‐report scales are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Katz, N. P., Kerns, R. D., Stucki, G., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., et al. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012 · Cited by 3,732
Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Turk, D. C., Dworkin, R. H., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., Brandenburg, N., Carr, D. B., Cleeland, C., Dionne, R., Farrar, J. T., Galer, B. S., et al. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.001 · Cited by 3,510
The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods
Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver, S. (1986) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9 · Cited by 3,275
Cited by
Rabbitts, J. A., Fisher, E., Rosenbloom, B. N., & Palermo, T. M. (2017) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2017.03.007 · Cited by 317
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Lactobacillus GG in Children With Functional Abdominal Pain
Francavilla, R., Miniello, V., Magistà, A. M., De Canio, A., Bucci, N., Gagliardi, F., Lionetti, E., Castellaneta, S., Polimeno, L., Peccarisi, L., et al. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-0467 · Cited by 242
Acceptability of different caries management methods for primary molars in a RCT
Santamaria, R. M., Innes, N. P. T., Machiulskiene, V., Evans, D. J. P., Alkilzy, M., & Splieth, C. H. (2015) · International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry · doi:10.1111/ipd.12097 · Cited by 112
Feinstein, A. B., Sturgeon, J. A., Darnall, B. D., Dunn, A. L., Rico, T., Kao, M. C., & Bhandari, R. P. (2017) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.10.009 · Cited by 101
Weizman, Z., Abu-Abed, J., & Binsztok, M. (2016) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.04.003 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- von Baeyer, C. L.
- Venue
- Pain Research and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 157-162
- ISSN
- 1203-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1918-1523
- OpenAlex
- W1550531151
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Children’s Self‐Reports of Pain Intensity: Scale Selection, Limitations and Interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2006/197616
- The paper
- von Baeyer, C. L. (2006). Children’s Self‐Reports of Pain Intensity: Scale Selection, Limitations and Interpretation. Pain Research and Management. https://doi.org/10.1155/2006/197616
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
