Cited by 47

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autoantibodies and Liver Disease: Uses and Abuses

Zeman, Marilyn V, Hirschfield, Gideon M·2010·Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Confirming whether a patient has autoimmune liver disease is challenging, given its varied presentation and complex definitions. In the continued absence of pathognomonic serum markers, diagnosis requires evaluation of laboratory investigations and, frequently, a liver biopsy – all of which need to be interpreted in the correct clinical context, with an emphasis on exclusion of viral infections, drug toxicity and metabolic disease. However, clear diagnosis is important for appropriate and timely therapy. Autoantibodies remain important tools for clinicians, and were the first proposed serological markers to aid in differentiating viral from chronic autoimmune hepatitis. Their presence is occasionally considered to be synonymous with autoimmune liver disease – a misinterpretation of their clinical significance. The present article summarizes the serum autoantibodies currently investigated in clinical and research practice, along with a description of their value in adult chronic liver diseases, with an emphasis on their appropriate use in the diagnosis and management of patients with autoimmune liver disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2010/431913

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Strassburg CP, Manns MP. Autoantibodies and autoantigens in autoimmune hepatitis. Semin Liver Dis 2002;22:339-52.
  2. Manns MP, Vogel A. Autoimmune hepatitis, from mechanisms to therapy. Hepatology 2006;43:S132-44.
  3. Czaja AJ, Freese DK. Diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 2002;36:479-97.
  4. Heathcote EJ. Management of primary biliary cirrhosis. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases practice guidelines. Hepatology 2000;31:1005-13.
  5. LaRusso NF, Shneider BL, Black D, et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: Summary of a workshop. Hepatology 2006;44:746-64.
  6. Montano-Loza AJ, Lalor E, Mason AL. Recognizing immunoglobulin G4-related overlap syndromes in patients with pancreatic and hepatobiliary diseases. Can J Gastroenterol 2008;22:840-6.
  7. Elkon K, Casali P. Nature and functions of autoantibodies. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2008;4:491-8.
  8. Mackay IR. Historical reflections on autoimmune hepatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:3292-300.
  9. Keren DF. Antinuclear antibody testing. Clin Lab Med 2002;22:447-74.
  10. Muratori L, Granito A, Muratori P, et al. Antimitochondrial antibodies and other antibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis: Diagnostic and prognostic value. Clin Liver Dis 2008;12:261-76.
  11. Frenzel C, Herkel J, Luth S, et al. Evaluation of F-actin ELISA for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2731-6.
  12. Bogdanos DP, Invernizzi P, Mackay IR, Vergani D. Autoimmune liver serology: Current diagnostic and clinical challenges. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:3374-87.
  13. Philipp T, Durazzo M, Trautwein C, et al. Recognition of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferases by LKM-3 antibodies in chronic hepatitis D. Lancet 1994;344:578-81.
  14. Bhat M, Guindi M, Heathcote EJ, Hirschfield GM. Transient development of anti-mitochondrial antibodies accompanies autoimmune hepatitis-sclerosing cholangitis overlap. Gut 2009;58:152-3.
  15. Wijeyesinghe U, Russell AS. Outcome of high titer antinuclear antibody positivity in individuals without connective tissue disease: A 10-year follow-up. Clin Rheumatol 2008;27:1399-402.
  16. Kavanaugh A, Tomar R, Reveille J, et al. Guidelines for clinical use of the antinuclear antibody test and tests for specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens. American College of Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:71-81.
  17. Alvarez F, Berg PA, Bianchi FB, et al. International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group Report: Review of criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol 1999;31:929-38.
  18. Hennes EM, Zeniya M, Czaja AJ, et al. Simplified criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 2008;48:169-76.
  19. Cassani F, Cataleta M, Valentini P, et al. Serum autoantibodies in chronic hepatitis C: Comparison with autoimmune hepatitis and impact on the disease profile. Hepatology 1997;26:561-6.
  20. Holdener M, Hintermann E, Bayer M, et al. Breaking tolerance to the natural human liver autoantigen cytochrome P450 2D6 by virus infection. J Exp Med 2008;205:1409-22.
  21. O'Brien C, Joshi S, Feld JJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of antimitochondrial antibody-positive autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 2008;48:550-6.
  22. Kaplan MM, Gershwin ME. Primary biliary cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1261-73.
  23. Oertelt S, Rieger R, Selmi C, et al. A sensitive bead assay for antimitochondrial antibodies: Chipping away at AMA-negative primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007;45:659-65.
  24. Hov JR, Boberg KM, Karlsen TH. Autoantibodies in primary sclerosing cholangitis. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:3781-91.
  25. Das KM. Immunopathogenesis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: Possible role of a shared colonic and biliary epithelial antigen. J Gastrol Hepatol 2004;19:S290-4.
  26. Sakamaki S, Takayanagi N, Yoshizaki N, et al. Autoantibodies against the specific epitope of human tropomyosin(s) detected by a peptide based enzyme immunoassay in sera of patients with ulcerative colitis show antibody dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity against HLA-DPw9 transfected L cells. Gut 2000;47:236-41.
  27. Xu B, Broome U, Ericzon BG, Sumitran-Holgersson S. High frequency of autoantibodies in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis that bind biliary epithelial cells and induce expression of CD44 and production of interleukin 6. Gut 2002;51:120-7.
  28. Rigopoulou EI, Mytilinaiou M, Romanidou O, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis-specific antibodies against soluble liver antigen and liver cytosol type 1 in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. J Autoimmune Dis 2007;4:2.
  29. Fritzler MJ. Challenges to the use of autoantibodies as predictors of disease onset, diagnosis and outcomes. Autoimmun Rev 2008;7:616-20.
  30. Tahiri F, Le Naour F, Huguet S, et al. Identification of plasma membrane autoantigens in autoimmune hepatitis type 1 using a proteomics tool. Hepatology 2008;47:937-48.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zeman, M. V., & Hirschfield, G. M.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-14
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
225-231
ISSN
  • 2291-2789
  • 2291-2797
Cited by
47
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review