Cited by 30Cardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCellular Mechanics and Interactions

Titin–actin interaction: PEVK-actin-based viscosity in a large animal

Open access
Chung, Charles S., Bogomolovas, Julius, Gasch, Alexander, Hidalgo, Carlos G., Labeit, Siegfried, Granzier, Henk L.·2011·BioMed Research International

Abstract

Titin exhibits an interaction between its PEVK segment and the actin filament resulting in viscosity, a speed dependent resistive force, which significantly influences diastolic filling in mice. While diastolic disease is clinically pervasive, humans express a more compliant titin (N2BA:N2B ratio ~0.5–1.0) than mice (N2BA:N2B ratio ~0.2). To examine PEVK‐actin based viscosity in compliant titin‐tissues, we used pig cardiac tissue that expresses titin isoforms similar to that in humans. Stretch‐hold experiments were performed at speeds from 0.1 to 10 lengths/s from slack sarcomere lengths (SL) to SL of 2.15 μ m. Viscosity was calculated from the slope of stress‐relaxation vs stretch speed. Recombinant PEVK was added to compete off native interactions and this found to reduce the slope by 35%, suggesting that PEVK‐actin interactions are a strong contributor of viscosity. Frequency sweeps were performed at frequencies of 0.1–400 Hz and recombinant protein reduced viscous moduli by 40% at 2.15 μ m and by 50% at 2.25 μ m, suggesting a SL‐dependent nature of viscosity that might prevent SL “overshoot’’ at long diastolic SLs. This study is the first to show that viscosity is present at physiologic speeds in the pig and supports the physiologic relevance of PEVK‐actin interactions in humans in both health and disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2011/310791

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Swine express more N2BA isoform (N2BA:N2B ratio 1-1.5) than humans (ratio 0.4-1.2).

    “the swine expresses more N2BA isoform (N2BA:N2B ratio of 1–1.5) than humans (N2BA:N2B ratio of 0.4–1.2) (Cazorla, et al., 2000; Chung, et al., 2011; Makarenko, et al., 2004; Nagueh, et al., 2004).”
  • Both stiff N2B and compliant N2BA titin isoforms are expressed at considerable levels in swine myocardium.

    “Both stiff N2B and compliant N2BA titin isoforms are expressed at considerable levels in swine myocardium (Cazorla, et al., 2000; Chung, et al., 2011; Opitz & Linke, 2005).”
  • One report concluded that swine not only expressed more N2BA than humans, but the N2BA:N2B ratio was more similar to dilated human cardiomyopathy, a condition where N2BA expression is upregulated.

    “one of these reports (Chung, et al., 2011) concluded that not only swine expressed more N2BA than humans, but additionally the N2BA:N2B ratio of this animal model was more similar to dilated human cardiomyopathy, a condition were N2BA expression is upregulated (Makarenko, et al., 2004; Nagueh, et al., 2004).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 30

Authors
Chung, C. S., Bogomolovas, J., Gasch, A., Hidalgo, C. G., Labeit, S., & Granzier, H. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Granzier, Henk L.
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
2011
Issue
1
Pages
310791-310791
ISSN
  • 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
OpenAlex
W2128217303
Cited by
30
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioMed Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (0825748G, T32 HL07249-31, R01 HL062881)
  • National Institutes of Health (0825748G, T32 HL07249-31, R01 HL062881)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
titin, F-actin, viscosity, sarcomere length, diastolic filling, stress relaxation, frequency sweep, resistance force
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Heart Ventricles, Muscle Proteins, Myocardial Contraction, Myocardium, Protein Kinases, Recombinant Proteins, Sarcomeres, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Mechanical, Swine, Viscosity, Protein Isoforms, Connectin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review