Titin–actin interaction: PEVK-actin-based viscosity in a large animal
Open accessAbstract
Titin exhibits an interaction between its PEVK segment and the actin filament resulting in viscosity, a speed dependent resistive force, which significantly influences diastolic filling in mice. While diastolic disease is clinically pervasive, humans express a more compliant titin (N2BA:N2B ratio ~0.5–1.0) than mice (N2BA:N2B ratio ~0.2). To examine PEVK‐actin based viscosity in compliant titin‐tissues, we used pig cardiac tissue that expresses titin isoforms similar to that in humans. Stretch‐hold experiments were performed at speeds from 0.1 to 10 lengths/s from slack sarcomere lengths (SL) to SL of 2.15 μ m. Viscosity was calculated from the slope of stress‐relaxation vs stretch speed. Recombinant PEVK was added to compete off native interactions and this found to reduce the slope by 35%, suggesting that PEVK‐actin interactions are a strong contributor of viscosity. Frequency sweeps were performed at frequencies of 0.1–400 Hz and recombinant protein reduced viscous moduli by 40% at 2.15 μ m and by 50% at 2.25 μ m, suggesting a SL‐dependent nature of viscosity that might prevent SL “overshoot’’ at long diastolic SLs. This study is the first to show that viscosity is present at physiologic speeds in the pig and supports the physiologic relevance of PEVK‐actin interactions in humans in both health and disease.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Swine express more N2BA isoform (N2BA:N2B ratio 1-1.5) than humans (ratio 0.4-1.2).
“the swine expresses more N2BA isoform (N2BA:N2B ratio of 1–1.5) than humans (N2BA:N2B ratio of 0.4–1.2) (Cazorla, et al., 2000; Chung, et al., 2011; Makarenko, et al., 2004; Nagueh, et al., 2004).”
From Small and large animal models in cardiac contraction research: advantages and disadvantages (2014) · cites this paper as Chung, et al., 2011
Both stiff N2B and compliant N2BA titin isoforms are expressed at considerable levels in swine myocardium.
“Both stiff N2B and compliant N2BA titin isoforms are expressed at considerable levels in swine myocardium (Cazorla, et al., 2000; Chung, et al., 2011; Opitz & Linke, 2005).”
From Small and large animal models in cardiac contraction research: advantages and disadvantages (2014) · cites this paper as Chung, et al., 2011
One report concluded that swine not only expressed more N2BA than humans, but the N2BA:N2B ratio was more similar to dilated human cardiomyopathy, a condition where N2BA expression is upregulated.
“one of these reports (Chung, et al., 2011) concluded that not only swine expressed more N2BA than humans, but additionally the N2BA:N2B ratio of this animal model was more similar to dilated human cardiomyopathy, a condition were N2BA expression is upregulated (Makarenko, et al., 2004; Nagueh, et al., 2004).”
From Small and large animal models in cardiac contraction research: advantages and disadvantages (2014) · cites this paper as Chung, et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Chung, C. S., Bogomolovas, J., Gasch, A., Hidalgo, C. G., Labeit, S., & Granzier, H. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Granzier, Henk L.
- Venue
- BioMed Research International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 2011
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 310791-310791
- ISSN
- 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
- 2314-6133
- 2314-6141
- PMC
- PMC3227466
- OpenAlex
- W2128217303
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- BioMed Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- American Heart Association (0825748G, T32 HL07249-31, R01 HL062881)
- National Institutes of Health (0825748G, T32 HL07249-31, R01 HL062881)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Keywords
- titin, F-actin, viscosity, sarcomere length, diastolic filling, stress relaxation, frequency sweep, resistance force
- MeSH terms
- Actins, Animals, Heart Ventricles, Muscle Proteins, Myocardial Contraction, Myocardium, Protein Kinases, Recombinant Proteins, Sarcomeres, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Mechanical, Swine, Viscosity, Protein Isoforms, Connectin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review