Intra-tumoral Heterogeneity of KRAS and BRAF Mutation Status in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer (aCRC) and Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sample Testing
Open accessAbstract
KRAS mutation status is established as a predictive biomarker of benefit from anti-EGFr therapies. Mutations are normally assessed using DNA extracted from one formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor block. We assessed heterogeneity of KRAS and BRAF mutation status intra-tumorally (multiple blocks from the same primary tumor). We also investigated the utility and efficiency of genotyping a ‘DNA cocktail’ prepared from multiple blocks. We studied 68 consenting patients in two randomized clinical trials. DNA was extracted, from ≥2 primary tumor FFPE blocks per patient. DNA was genotyped by pyrosequencing for KRAS codons 12, 13 and 61 and BRAF codon 600. In patients with heterogeneous mutation status, DNA cocktails were prepared and genotyped. Among 69 primary tumors in 68 patients, 7 (10.1%) showed intratumoral heterogeneity; 5 (7.2%) at KRAS codons 12, 13 and 2 (2.9%) at BRAF codon 600. In patients displaying heterogeneity, the relevant KRAS or BRAF mutation was also identified in ‘DNA cocktail’ samples when including DNA from mutant and wild-type blocks. Heterogeneity is uncommon but not insignificant. Testing DNA from a single block will wrongly assign wild-type status to 10% patients. Testing more than one block, or preferably preparation of a ‘DNA cocktail’ from two or more tumor blocks, improves mutation detection at minimal extra cost.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mutation status of KRAS gene could be heterogeneous in the same patient, leading to heterogeneous responses to K-RasG12C inhibition across individuals and in different tumors of the same patient.
“Notably, the mutation status of KRAS gene could be heterogeneous in the same patient, which leads to the heterogeneous responses to K-RasG12C inhibition across individuals, as well as in different tumors of the same patient (Figure 3E).70,71”
From Overcoming Resistance to Drugs Targeting KRAS Mutation (2020) · cites this paper as [71]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Richman, S. D., Chambers, P., Seymour, M. T., Daly, C., Grant, S., Hemmings, G., & Quirke, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- The Sections of Pathology and Tumour Biology and Oncology, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Corresponding author
- Quirke, Philip
- Venue
- Analytical Cellular Pathology
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 61-66
- ISSN
- 0921-8912 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-7177
- 2210-7185
- OpenAlex
- W4230622721
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Analytical Cellular Pathology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Leeds CRUK Cancer Centre
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Keywords
- KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, intratumoral heterogeneity, advanced colorectal cancer, anti-EGFR therapy, predictive biomarkers, cost-effectiveness, pyrosequencing, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review