Cited by 21Mental Health Treatment and AccessSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Factors influencing risk of premature mortality in community cases of depression: a meta-analytic review

Open access
Baxter, Amanda J., Page, Andrew, Whiteford, Harvey A.·2011·Epidemiology Research International

Abstract

Background. Depressive disorders are associated with substantial risk of premature mortality. A number of factors may contribute to reported risk estimates, making it difficult to determine actual risk of excess mortality in community cases of depression. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of excess mortality in population-based studies of clinically defined depression. Methods. Population-based studies reporting all-cause mortality associated with a clinically defined depressive disorder were included in the systematic review. Estimates of relative risk for excess mortality in population-representative cases of clinical depressive disorders were extracted. A meta-analysis was conducted using Stata to pool estimates of excess mortality and identify sources of heterogeneity within the data. Results. Twenty-one studies reporting risk of excess mortality in clinical depression were identified. A significantly higher risk of mortality was found for major depression (RR 1.92 95% CI 1.65–2.23), but no significant difference was found for dysthymia (RR 1.37 95% CI 0.93–2.00). Relative risk of excess mortality was not significantly different following the adjustment of reported risk estimates. Conclusion. A mortality gradient was identified with increasing severity of clinical depression. Recognition of depressive symptoms in general practice and appropriate referral for evidence-based treatment may help improve outcomes, particularly in patients with comorbid physical disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2011/832945

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence for an elevated risk for mortality in those diagnosed with MDD.

    “We found evidence for an elevated risk for mortality in those diagnosed with MDD [2],[25]; however, since a health outcome could only occur once in the GBD cause list, MDD related deaths from suicide and ischemic heart disease were captured under the headings of intentional injuries and cardiovascular disease in the GBD capstone papers [14],[18].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 21

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. K. Hawton and K. van Heeringen, "Suicide," The Lancet, vol. 373, no. 9672, pp. 1372-1381, 2009.
  2. D. W. Black, "Iowa record-linkage study: death rates in psychiatric patients," Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 50, no. 2-3, pp. 277-282, 1998.
  3. T. J. Craig and S. P. Lin, "Mortality among psychiatric inpa- tients. Age-adjusted comparison of populations before and after psychotropic drug era," Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 935-938, 1981.
  4. APA, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR), Text Revision, American Psychiatric Associa- tion, Washington, DC, USA, 4th edition, 2000.
  5. D. F. Stroup, J. A. Berlin, S. C. Morton et al., "Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting," Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 283, no. 15, pp. 2008-2012, 2000.
  6. K. Engedal, "Mortality in the elderly-a 3-year follow-up of an elderly community sample," International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 467-471, 1996.
  7. M. M. Desai, "The effects of psychiatric history on cancer outcomes: longitudinal evidence from a community sample of women," Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, vol. 58, no. 4B, p. 1828, 1997.

Authors
Baxter, A. J., Page, A., & Whiteford, H. A.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Baxter, Amanda J.
Venue
Epidemiology Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-22
Volume
2011
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 2090-2972 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-2980
OpenAlex
W1985785669
Cited by
21
References
86
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Epidemiology Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
depression, premature mortality, excess mortality, major depressive disorder, dysthymia, depression severity, general practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review