The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simple, Inexpensive Technique for High-Quality Smartphone Fundus Photography in Human and Animal Eyes
Open accessAbstract
Purpose. We describe in detail a relatively simple technique of fundus photography in human and rabbit eyes using a smartphone, an inexpensive app for the smartphone, and instruments that are readily available in an ophthalmic practice.Methods. Fundus images were captured with a smartphone and a 20D lens with or without a Koeppe lens. By using the coaxial light source of the phone, this system works as an indirect ophthalmoscope that creates a digital image of the fundus. The application whose software allows for independent control of focus, exposure, and light intensity during video filming was used. With this app, we recorded high-definition videos of the fundus and subsequently extracted high-quality, still images from the video clip.Results. The described technique of smartphone fundus photography was able to capture excellent high-quality fundus images in both children under anesthesia and in awake adults. Excellent images were acquired with the 20D lens alone in the clinic, and the addition of the Koeppe lens in the operating room resulted in the best quality images. Successful photodocumentation of rabbit fundus was achieved in control and experimental eyes.Conclusion. The currently described system was able to take consistently high-quality fundus photographs in patients and in animals using readily available instruments that are portable with simple power sources. It is relatively simple to master, is relatively inexpensive, and can take advantage of the expanding mobile-telephone networks for telemedicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smartphone Sensors for Health Monitoring and Diagnosis
Majumder, S., & Deen, M. J. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19092164 · Cited by 435
Panwar, N., Huang, P., Lee, J., Keane, P. A., Chuan, T. S., Richhariya, A., Teoh, S., Lim, T. H., & Agrawal, R. (2016) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2015.0068 · Cited by 293
A Deep Learning-Based Algorithm Identifies Glaucomatous Discs Using Monoscopic Fundus Photographs
Liu, S., Graham, S. L., Schulz, A., Kalloniatis, M., Zangerl, B., Cai, W., Gao, Y., Chua, B., Arvind, H., Grigg, J., et al. (2018) · Ophthalmology Glaucoma · doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2018.04.002 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Haddock, L. J., Kim, D. Y., & Mukai, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 2013
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 2090-004X (ISSN-L)
- 2090-0058
- OpenAlex
- W2143705711
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simple, Inexpensive Technique for High-Quality Smartphone Fundus Photography in Human and Animal Eyes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2013/518479
- The paper
- Haddock, L. J., Kim, D. Y., & Mukai, S. (2013). Simple, Inexpensive Technique for High-Quality Smartphone Fundus Photography in Human and Animal Eyes. Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/518479
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.