Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles Using Cannonball Leaves and Their Cytotoxic Activity against MCF-7 Cell Line

Devaraj, Preetha, Kumari, Prachi, Aarti, Chirom, Renganathan, Arun·2013·Journal of Nanotechnology

Abstract

Cannonball ( Couroupita guianensis ) is a tree belonging to the family Lecythidaceae. Various parts of the tree have been reported to contain oils, keto steroids, glycosides, couroupitine, indirubin, isatin, and phenolic substances. We report here the synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using cannonball leaves. Green synthesized nanoparticles have been characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopy, SEM, TEM, and FTIR. Cannonball leaf broth as a reducing agent converts silver ions to AgNPs in a rapid and ecofriendly manner. The UV-Vis spectra gave surface plasmon resonance peak at 434 nm. TEM image shows well-dispersed silver nanoparticles with an average particle size of 28.4 nm. FTIR showed the structure and respective bands of the synthesized nanoparticles and the stretch of bonds. Green synthesized silver nanoparticles by cannonball leaf extract show cytotoxicity to human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7). Overall, this environmentally friendly method of biological silver nanoparticles production provides rates of synthesis faster than or comparable to those of chemical methods and can potentially be used in various human contacting areas such as cosmetics, foods, and medical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2013/598328

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 UV-Vis absorption spectrum of (a) cannonball leaf extract and (b) biosynthesized AgNPs.
Figure 1 UV-Vis absorption spectrum of (a) cannonball leaf extract and (b) biosynthesized AgNPs.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 SEM micrograph of AgNPs synthesized from cannonball leaf extract.
Figure 2 SEM micrograph of AgNPs synthesized from cannonball leaf extract.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Transmission electron microscopy images of AgNPs at different magnification levels ((a) and (b)-100 nm; (c) and (d)-200 nm).
Figure 3 Transmission electron microscopy images of AgNPs at different magnification levels ((a) and (b)-100 nm; (c) and (d)-200 nm).CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Cytotoxicity of synthesized AgNPs on MCF-7cells.
Figure 5 Cytotoxicity of synthesized AgNPs on MCF-7cells.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 8
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 9
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 10
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 11
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 12
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 13
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 14
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 15
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 16
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 17
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 18
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 19
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 20
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 21
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 22
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 23
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 2007, Pharmacologyonline, 3, 269
  2. 10.1016/j.jep.2009.10.025 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00639-Q · DOI
  4. 2006, Turkish Journal of Biology, 30, 177
  5. 2009, The Internet Journal of Alternative Medicine, 8, 107
  6. 10.1126/science.254.5036.1300 · DOI
  7. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/10/105104 · DOI
  8. 10.1021/nl0155274 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0167-7799(00)01514-6 · DOI
  10. 10.1155/2009/734264 · DOI
  11. 10.1088/0957-4484/14/1/321 · DOI
  12. 2008, Journal of Sciences Islamic Azad University, 17, 1
  13. 2011, International Journal of Medicobiological Research, 1, 130
  14. 1983, Journal of Immunological Methods, 65, 55, 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1021/la9502711 · DOI
  16. 2010, Journal of Biopesticides, 3, 394
  17. 10.1166/asl.2011.1246 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.03.040 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s11051-008-9494-9 · DOI
  20. 2011, Journal of Chemical Pharmaceutical Research, 3, 115
  21. 10.1055/s-0029-1234973 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s00436-010-2212-4 · DOI
  23. 2009, African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, 6, 526
  24. 10.1080/14786411003752094 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Devaraj, P., Kumari, P., Aarti, C., & Renganathan, A.
Venue
Journal of Nanotechnology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013
Volume
2013
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 1687-9503
  • 1687-9511
Cited by
208
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review