Finger Tapping Clinimetric Score Prediction in Parkinson's Disease Using Low-Cost Accelerometers
Open accessAbstract
The motor clinical hallmarks of Parkinson's disease (PD) are usually quantified by physicians using validated clinimetric scales such as the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). However, clinical ratings are prone to subjectivity and inter-rater variability. The PD medical community is therefore looking for a simple, inexpensive, and objective rating method. As a first step towards this goal, a triaxial accelerometer-based system was used in a sample of 36 PD patients and 10 age-matched controls as they performed the MDS-UPDRS finger tapping (FT) task. First, raw signals were epoched to isolate the successive single FT movements. Next, eighteen FT task movement features were extracted, depicting MDS-UPDRS features and accelerometer specific features. An ordinal logistic regression model and a greedy backward algorithm were used to identify the most relevant features in the prediction of MDS-UPDRS FT scores, given by 3 specialists in movement disorders (SMDs). The Goodman-Kruskal Gamma index obtained (0.961), depicting the predictive performance of the model, is similar to those obtained between the individual scores given by the SMD (0.870 to 0.970). The automatic prediction of MDS-UPDRS scores using the proposed system may be valuable in clinical trials designed to evaluate and modify motor disability in PD patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stamatakis et al. demonstrate logistic regression to predict UPDRS from features of performance on a finger tapping test recorded by accelerometer.
“For example, Stamatakis et al. 10 demonstrate logistic regression to predict UPDRS from features of performance on a finger tapping test recorded by accelerometer.”
From Machine learning for large‐scale wearable sensor data in Parkinson's disease: Concepts, promises, pitfalls, and futures (2016) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 108
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [24]Guyon I Elisseeff A An introduction to variable and feature selection The Journal of Machine Learning Research 2003 3 1157 1182
- Authors
- Stamatakis, J., Ambroise, J., Crémers, J., Sharei, H., Delvaux, V., Macq, B., & Garraux, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Liège (BE)
- Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Place du Levant 2, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Stamatakis, Julien
- Venue
- Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 2013
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1687-5265 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-5273
- PMC
- PMC3652130
- OpenAlex
- W2041367523
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, finger tapping, MDS-UPDRS, triaxial accelerometer, low-cost wearable sensors, motion features, interobserver variability, ordinal logistic regression, feature selection, clinical trials
- MeSH terms
- Acceleration, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Disability Evaluation, Equipment Design, Female, Fingers, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Neurologic Examination, Neurology, Parkinson Disease, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychomotor Performance, ROC Curve, Logistic Models, Area Under Curve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review