Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Degradation of Anthraquinone Dye Reactive Blue 4 in Pyrite Ash Catalyzed Fenton Reaction

Becelic-Tomin, Milena, Dalmacija, Bozo, Rajic, Ljiljana, Tomasevic, Dragana, Kerkez, Djurdja, Watson, Malcolm, Prica, Miljana·2014·The Scientific World Journal

Abstract

Pyrite ash (PA) is created by burning pyrite in the chemical production of sulphuric acid. The high concentration of iron oxide, mostly hematite, present in pyrite ash, gives the basis for its application as a source of catalytic iron in a modified Fenton process for anthraquinone dye reactive blue 4 (RB4) degradation. The effect of various operating variables such as catalyst and oxidant concentration, initial pH and RB4 concentration on the abatement of total organic carbon, and dye has been assessed in this study. Here we show that degradation of RB4 in the modified Fenton reaction was efficient under the following conditions:pH=2.5;[PA]0=0.2 g L−1;[H2O2]0=5 mM and initial RB4 concentration up to 100 mg L−1. The pyrite ash Fenton reaction can overcome limitations observed from the classic Fenton reaction, such as the early termination of the Fenton reaction. Metal (Pb, Zn, and Cu) content of the solution after the process suggests that an additional treatment step is necessary to remove the remaining metals from the water. These results provide basic knowledge to better understand the modified, heterogeneous Fenton process and apply the PA Fenton reaction for the treatment of wastewaters which contains anthraquinone dyes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2014/234654

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Structure of RB4 dye.
Figure 1 Structure of RB4 dye.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Effects of operational parameters on process efficiency and iron leaching: (a) pH; (b) H2O2 concentration; (c) PA concentration; (d) RB4 concentration.
Figure 2 Effects of operational parameters on process efficiency and iron leaching: (a) pH; (b) H2O2 concentration; (c) PA concentration; (d) RB4 concentration.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Leaching metals from PA during the reaction (pH = 2.5; [PA]0 = 0.2 g/L−1; [H2O2]0 = 5 mM; [RB4] = 100 mg/L).
Figure 3 Leaching metals from PA during the reaction (pH = 2.5; [PA]0 = 0.2 g/L−1; [H2O2]0 = 5 mM; [RB4] = 100 mg/L).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Metal concentrations after lime addition.
Figure 4 Metal concentrations after lime addition.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2011, Official Gazette, 67, 13

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Becelic-Tomin, M., Dalmacija, B., Rajic, L., Tomasevic, D., Kerkez, D., Watson, M., & Prica, M.
Venue
The Scientific World Journal
Published
2014
Volume
2014
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 2356-6140
  • 1537-744X
Cited by
22
References
47
Language
en
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (III43005, TR37004)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Degradation of Anthraquinone Dye Reactive Blue 4 in Pyrite Ash Catalyzed Fenton Reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2014/234654
The paper
Becelic-Tomin, M., Dalmacija, B., Rajic, L., Tomasevic, D., Kerkez, D., Watson, M., & Prica, M. (2014). Degradation of Anthraquinone Dye Reactive Blue 4 in Pyrite Ash Catalyzed Fenton Reaction. The Scientific World Journal. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/234654

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.