Cited by 35Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Clinical evaluation of various thyroid hormones on thyroid function

Open access
Li, Hong, Yuan, Xiaolan, Liu, Lu, Zhou, Jiaojiao, Li, Chunyan, Yang, Peng, Bu, Le, Zhang, Manna +1 more·2014·International Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

To clarify the clinical value of serums total triiodothyronine (TT3), total thyroxine (TT4), free triiodothyronine (FT3), and free thyroxine (FT4) and provide a more eligible and economic strategy to assess thyroid function. A total of 2,673 participants (500 patients with hyperthyroidism, 500 patients with hypothyroidism, and 1,673 healthy people) were involved in our study. Serums TT3, TT4, FT3, and FT4 and thyrotropin (TSH) were measured with VIDAS fluorescent enzyme immunoassay. The Pearson correlation between TT3, TT4, FT3, and FT4 and TSH was determined to identify the most important indicator for thyroid function besides TSH. The correlation of TT4, and FT4 with TSH was statistically significant in healthy individuals (P < 0.01), and the R-values were -0.065 and -0.152, respectively. The correlation of TT4, FT4, TT3, and FT3 with TSH was statistically significant in patients with hyperthyroidism, and the R-values were -0.241, -0.225, -0.195, and -0.176, respectively. The correlation of TT4, FT4, TT3, and FT3 with TSH was statistically significant in patients with hypothyroidism, and the R-values were -0.322, -0.262, -0.179, and -0.136, respectively. In our opinion, TSH and FT4 are the most valuable indicators in assessing thyroid function in a healthy population, and TSH and TT4 are the most meaningful in hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2014/618572

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lab test of FT4 is a more accurate evaluation of thyroid hormone concentration than measurement of total T3, T4 and FT3 due to limitations of measuring technique.

    “The lab testof FT4 is considered as a more accurate evaluation of thyroid hormone concentration than the measurement of total T3, T4 and FT3 due to the limitation of measuring technique (67).”

    From The progression of secondary diabetes: A review of modeling studies (2022) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Discussion says the opposite of the claim's central comparison: because current FT4 measurements lack stability and accuracy, TT4 is better than FT4 for clinical measurement and thyroid-function assessment. It also describes FT4 measurement as indirect and less stable and repeatable than TT4. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 35

Authors
Li, H., Yuan, X., Liu, L., Zhou, J., Li, C., Yang, P., Bu, L., Zhang, M., & Qu, S.
Affiliations
Tongji University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Hong
Venue
International Journal of Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014
Volume
2014
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 1687-8337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-8345
OpenAlex
W2008909345
Cited by
35
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (30700387)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
thyroid function assessment, free thyroxine, free triiodothyronine, total thyroxine, total triiodothyronine, thyroid-stimulating hormone, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, thyroid hormones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review