Cited by 396Gut microbiota and healthPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesProbiotics and Fermented Foods

A survey of modulation of gut microbiota by dietary polyphenols

Open access
Dueñas, Montserrat, Muñoz-González, Irene, Cueva, Carolina, Jiménez-Girón, Ana, Sánchez-Patán, Fernando, Santos-Buelga, Celestino, Moreno-Arribas, M. Victoria, Bartolomé, Begoña·2015·BioMed Research International

Abstract

Dietary polyphenols present in a broad range of plant foods have been related to beneficial health effects. This review aims to update the current information about the modulation of the gut microbiota by dietary phenolic compounds, from a perspective based on the experimental approaches used. After referring to general aspects of gut microbiota and dietary polyphenols, studies related to this topic are presented according to their experimental design: batch culture fermentations, gastrointestinal simulators, animal model studies, and human intervention studies. In general, studies evidence that dietary polyphenols may contribute to the maintenance of intestinal health by preserving the gut microbial balance through the stimulation of the growth of beneficial bacteria (i.e., lactobacilli and bifidobacteria) and the inhibition of pathogenic bacteria, exerting prebiotic-like effects. Combination of in vitro and in vivo models could help to understand the underlying mechanisms in the polyphenols-microbiota-host triangle and elucidate the implications of polyphenols on human health. From a technological point of view, supplementation with rich-polyphenolic stuffs (phenolic extracts, phenolic-enriched fractions, etc.) could be an effective option to improve health benefits of functional foods such as the case of dairy fermented foods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2015/850902

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polyphenols display a prebiotic-like effect, increasing the growth of beneficial bacterial strains, such as bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, while reducing the number of potential pathogens, such as C. perfringens and C. histolyticum in a dose-dependent manner.

    “Polyphenols display a “prebioticlike” effect, increasing the growth of beneficial bacterial strains, such as bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, while reducing the number of potential pathogens, such as C. perfringens and C. histolyticum in a dose-dependent manner (83,84).”
  • Approximately 90-95% of polyphenols are not absorbed and thus can be degraded by intestinal microbes.

    “Approximately 90-95% of polyphenols are not absorbed and thus can be degraded by intestinal microbes (83).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 89 · Cited by 396

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [76]Yamakoshi J. Tokutake S. Kikuchi M. Kubota Y. Konishi H. Mitsuoka T. Effect of proantocyanidin -rich extract from grape seed on human fecal flora and fecalodor FASEB Journal 2001 15 4 p. A633

Authors
Dueñas, M., Muñoz-González, I., Cueva, C., Jiménez-Girón, A., Sánchez-Patán, F., Santos-Buelga, C., Moreno-Arribas, M. V., & Bartolomé, B.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
  • Grupo de Biotecnología Enológica Aplicada, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL), CSIC-UAM, Campus de Cantoblanco, C/Nicolás Cabrera 9, 28049 Madrid, Spain
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Grupo de Investigación en Polifenoles, Unidad de Nutrición y Bromatología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
Corresponding author
Bartolomé, Begoña
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015
Volume
2015
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
OpenAlex
W1996535102
Cited by
396
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 10
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioMed Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Gredos (University of Salamanca) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (AGL2012-40172-C02-01, AGL2010-17499, BFU2012-35228)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
dietary polyphenols, gut microbiota, phenolic compounds, prebiotic activity, lactobacilli, Bifidobacterium, pathogenic bacteria inhibition, gut health, in vitro fermentation, animal models, human intervention studies, functional foods
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Diet, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Gastrointestinal Tract, Polyphenols, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review