Car Detection from Low-Altitude UAV Imagery with the Faster R-CNN
Open accessAbstract
UAV based traffic monitoring holds distinct advantages over traditional traffic sensors, such as loop detectors, as UAVs have higher mobility, wider field of view, and less impact on the observed traffic. For traffic monitoring from UAV images, the essential but challenging task is vehicle detection. This paper extends the framework of Faster R-CNN for car detection from low-altitude UAV imagery captured over signalized intersections. Experimental results show that Faster R-CNN can achieve promising car detection results compared with other methods. Our tests further demonstrate that Faster R-CNN is robust to illumination changes and cars’ in-plane rotation. Besides, the detection speed of Faster R-CNN is insensitive to the detection load, that is, the number of detected cars in a frame; therefore, the detection speed is almost constant for each frame. In addition, our tests show that Faster R-CNN holds great potential for parking lot car detection. This paper tries to guide the readers to choose the best vehicle detection framework according to their applications. Future research will be focusing on expanding the current framework to detect other transportation modes such as buses, trucks, motorcycles, and bicycles.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other metrics such as quality, completeness, and correctness are also used to evaluate object detection frameworks.
“Other metrics, such as quality, completeness, and correctness, are also used to evaluate the performance of object detection frameworks, for instance in [53].”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [53]
For traffic monitoring under illumination changes and in-plane rotation in [53], Faster R-CNN provided optimum results compared to background subtraction, frame difference, Viola-Jones, and HoG+SVM approaches.
“problems of illumination changes and in-plane rotation were tackled in [53] while performing traffic monitoring tasks, showing that Faster R-CNN provided optimum result in comparison to background subtraction algorithm [18], frame difference approach [106], Viola-Jones method [107] and HoG+SVM approach [22].”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [53]
The Faster R-CNN with VGG-16 achieves a Quality of 94.94% on a custom dataset.
“[53] Faster R-CNN | VGG-16 | Custom | 1920 × 1080 (24fps) | 100 to 150m | Static UAV | One class (Car) | -- | -- | -- | 94.94 |”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [53]
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 56,035 · see citing works
Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.167 · Cited by 9,853 · see citing works
Original approach for the localisation of objects in images
Vaillant, R. (1994) · IEE Proceedings - Vision, Image, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1049/ip-vis:19941301 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System
Bisio, I., Garibotto, C., Haleem, H., Lavagetto, F., & Sciarrone, A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3207282 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
“Other 363 metrics, such as quality, completeness, and correctness, are 364 also used to evaluate the performance of object detection 365 frameworks, for instance in [53].”
Method
- Authors
- Xu, Y., Yu, G., Wang, Y., Wu, X., & Ma, Y.
- Affiliations
- Beihang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Guizhen
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Transportation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 2017
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0197-6729 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-3195
- OpenAlex
- W2752010668
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Transportation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (61371076, 51278021)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61371076, 51278021)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- vehicle detection, car detection, UAV imagery, low-altitude aerial imagery, Faster R-CNN, traffic monitoring, signalized intersections, illumination robustness, in-plane rotation, detection speed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review