The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Development of Augmented Reality in Surgery: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Introduction. The development augmented reality devices allow physicians to incorporate data visualization into diagnostic and treatment procedures to improve work efficiency, safety, and cost and to enhance surgical training. However, the awareness of possibilities of augmented reality is generally low. This review evaluates whether augmented reality can presently improve the results of surgical procedures. Methods. We performed a review of available literature dating from 2010 to November 2016 by searching PubMed and Scopus using the terms “augmented reality” and “surgery.” Results. The initial search yielded 808 studies. After removing duplicates and including only journal articles, a total of 417 studies were identified. By reading of abstracts, 91 relevant studies were chosen to be included. 11 references were gathered by cross-referencing. A total of 102 studies were included in this review. Conclusions. The present literature suggest an increasing interest of surgeons regarding employing augmented reality into surgery leading to improved safety and efficacy of surgical procedures. Many studies showed that the performance of newly devised augmented reality systems is comparable to traditional techniques. However, several problems need to be addressed before augmented reality is implemented into the routine practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enhanced-Reality Video Fluorescence: A Real-Time Assessment of Intestinal Viability
Diana, M., Noll, E., Diemunsch, P., Dallemagne, B., Benahmed, M. A., Agnus, V., Soler, L., Barry, B., Namer, I. J., Demartines, N., et al. (2014) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e31828d4ab3 · Cited by 168
Cited by
Consumer behavior in augmented shopping reality. A review, synthesis, and research agenda
Hoffmann, S., & Mai, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2022.961236 · Cited by 68
Accuracy of augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement: A systematic review
Youssef, S., McDonnell, J. M., Wilson, K. V., Turley, L., Cunniffe, G., Morris, S., Darwish, S., & Butler, J. S. (2024) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-023-08094-5 · Cited by 36
“A recent systematic review by Vavra et al. [1] reports an accuracy range of 1–5 mm for augmented reality systems, highlighting its safety and efficacy across a variety of surgical procedures.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Vávra, P., Roman, J., Zonča, P., Ihnát, P., Němec, M., Kumar, J., Habib, N., & El-Gendi, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Healthcare Engineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 2017
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 2040-2295 (ISSN-L)
- 2040-2309
- OpenAlex
- W2748217987
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.