Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Conversion of Low-Flow Priapism to High-Flow State Using T-Shunt with Tunneling

Mistry, Neil A., Tadros, Nicholas N., Hedges, Jason C.·2017·Case Reports in Urology

Abstract

Introduction. The three types of priapism are stuttering, arterial (high-flow, nonischemic), and venoocclusive (low-flow, ischemic). These are usually distinct entities and rarely occur in the same patient. T-shunts and other distal shunts are frequently combined with tunneling, but a seldom recognized potential complication is conversion to a high-flow state.Case Presentation. We describe 2 cases of men who presented with low-flow priapism episodes that were treated using T-shunts with tunneling that resulted with both men having recurrent erections shortly after surgery that were found to be consistent with high-flow states. Case1was a 33-year-old male with sickle cell anemia and case2was a 24-year-old male with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. In both cases the men were observed over several weeks and both men returned to normal erectile function.Conclusions. Historically, proximal shunts were performed only in cases when distal shunts failed and carry a higher risk of serious complications. T-shunts and other distal shunts combined with tunneling are being used more frequently in place of proximal shunts. These cases illustrate how postoperative erections after T-shunts with tunneling can signify a conversion from low-flow to high-flow states and could potentially be misdiagnosed as an operative failure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2017/7394185

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 2012, Priapism, 749
  2. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01625.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 1998, Archivos Españoles de Urología, 51, article 269
  4. 1968, Journal of Urology, 99, 196, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)62672-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01176.x · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.juro.2008.12.021 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.034 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2010, Urology Journal, 7, 174
  9. 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.245 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02973.x · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s12262-011-0273-y · DOI
  12. 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900828 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901398 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02692.x · DOI
  15. 10.1155/2012/672624 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/jcu.20479 · DOI
  17. 10.1186/1757-1626-1-429 · DOI
  18. 1991, Blood, 77, 1405, 10.1182/blood.V77.7.1405.1405 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)67479-2 · DOI
  20. 2009, Journal of the Canadian Urological Association, 3, 60
  21. 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63590-0 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mistry, N. A., Tadros, N. N., & Hedges, J. C.
Venue
Case Reports in Urology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017
Volume
2017
Pages
1-4
ISSN
  • 2090-696X
  • 2090-6978
Cited by
3
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.