The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Some Medicinal Plants against Human Pathogenic Bacteria
Open accessAbstract
The emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance, as well as the evolution of new strains of disease causing agents, are of great concern to the global health community. Effective treatment of a disease entails the development of new pharmaceuticals or some potential source of novel drugs. Commonly used medicinal plants of our community could be an excellent source of drugs to fight off this problem. This study is focused on exploring the antimicrobial properties of the plants that are commonly being used as traditional medicines. The antimicrobial potential of four different plant extracts was screened against twelve pathogenic microorganisms and two reference bacterial strains. Methanolic extracts of Oxalis corniculata, Artemisia vulgaris, Cinnamomum tamala, and Ageratina adenophora were subjected to a test of their antimicrobial properties by agar well diffusion method. The result indicated that most of the extracts exhibited antimicrobial properties. The highest potential was observed in the extract of O. corniculata against Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhi, MDR Salmonella Typhi, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Citrobacter koseri with zone of inhibition (ZOI) of 17 mm, 13 mm, 16 mm, 11 mm, and 12 mm, respectively. Oxalis corniculata also showed the highest MIC against test organisms. The methanolic extract of Artemisia vulgaris, Cinnamomum tamala, and Ageratina adenophora showed efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus. Ageratina adenophora also showed antifungal activity against Rhizopus spp. The experiment confirmed the efficacy of some selected plant extracts as natural antimicrobials and suggested the possibility of employing them in drugs for the treatment of infectious diseases caused by the test organisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents
Cowan, M. M. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.4.564 · Cited by 9,043
Cited by
Stan, D., Enciu, A.-M., Mateescu, A. L., Ion, A. C., Brezeanu, A. C., Stan, D., & Tanase, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.723233 · Cited by 269
Dubale, S., Kebebe, D., Zeynudin, A., Abdissa, N., & Suleman, S. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Pharmacology · doi:10.2147/jep.s379805 · Cited by 267
Naik, K. S., & Gupta, R. B. (2022) · International Journal of Advances in Medicine · doi:10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20221711 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Manandhar, S., Luitel, S., & Dahal, R. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Tropical Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04-02
- Volume
- 2019
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 1687-9686 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-9694
- OpenAlex
- W2932350194
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Some Medicinal Plants against Human Pathogenic Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2019/1895340
- The paper
- Manandhar, S., Luitel, S., & Dahal, R. K. (2019). In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Some Medicinal Plants against Human Pathogenic Bacteria. Journal of Tropical Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1895340
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.