Cited by 11Cancer-related cognitive impairment studiesGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis

Clinical and Biological Correlates of Preoperative Cognitive Functioning of Glioma and Meningioma Patients

Open access
Pranckeviciene, Aiste, Deltuva, Vytenis P., Tamasauskas, Arimantas, Zegliene, Jurate, Bunevicius, Adomas·2020·BioMed Research International

Abstract

Objectives. This study aimed to investigate the association of high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hsCRP) and N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) serum concentrations with cognitive functions of glioma and meningioma patients. Methods. 177 brain tumor patients awaiting for brain tumor surgery participated in the study. Patients were assessed preoperatively, using neuropsychological tests for verbal memory, psychomotor speed, mental flexibility, and verbal fluency. The functional status of patients was evaluated using the Karnofsky Performance Index. Blood samples were drawn for evaluation of serum hsCRP and NT‐proBNP concentrations upon hospital admission. Results. The highest NT‐proBNP concentration was observed in meningioma patients. Glioma and meningioma patients did not differ in hsCRB concentration. Patients in the highest hsCRP tertile were older and more frequently reported cardiovascular comorbidity. Patients in the highest NT‐proBNP tertile were older, more frequently with cardiovascular comorbidity, females, and diagnosed with a meningioma. hsCRP was significantly related to slower psychomotor speed in high‐grade glioma patients (rho = 0.30, p < 0.05). In meningioma sample, NT‐proBNP correlated with decreased psychomotor speed (rho = 0.38, p < 0.01), mental flexibility (rho = 0.33, p < 0.01), worse cumulative learning (rho = −0.27, p < 0.05), and delayed recall (rho = 0.30, p < 0.01). However, the relationship between the NT‐proBNP and cognitive functions became nonsignificant when demographic and clinical covariates were included into analysis. Higher hsCRP concentration remained significantly related to slower psychomotor speed (p = 0.02) and worse mental flexibility (p = 0.05) in glioma patients, independently from demographic and clinical covariates. Preoperative cognitive functioning was also predicted by older age, gender, side and location of the tumor, and tumor malignancy, and general functional status of a patient. Conclusions. NT‐proBNP was not associated with memory, language, and attention/executive cognitive domains of glioma and meningioma patients. Increased hsCRP was related to slower psychomotor speed and worse mental flexibility in glioma patients, indicating that inflammation processes are important for cognitive functioning in glial tumors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2020/2054859

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRP blood levels have been associated with reduced performance in the Trail Making Test in several patient groups experiencing ongoing peripheral inflammatory activity.

    “Furthermore, CRP blood levels have been associated with reduced performance in the TMT in several patient groups experiencing ongoing peripheral inflammatory activity, such as those with peripheral arterial disease [49] and brain cancer [50] and aging populations [51].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 11

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Strauss E. Sherman E. M. S. Spreen O. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary 2006 3rd New York Oxford University Press

Authors
Pranckeviciene, A., Deltuva, V. P., Tamasauskas, A., Zegliene, J., & Bunevicius, A.
Affiliations
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT)
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01
Volume
2020
Issue
1
Pages
2054859-2054859
ISSN
  • 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
OpenAlex
W3022116819
Cited by
11
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioMed Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (submittedVersion)
Funders
Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba (MIP-044/2015)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Keywords
meningioma, preoperative cognitive function, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, NT-proBNP, psychomotor speed, cognitive flexibility, verbal memory, inflammation, brain tumor surgery, cardiovascular comorbidity, neuropsychological assessment, executive function, delayed recall, verbal fluency
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain Neoplasms, C-Reactive Protein, Cognition, Female, Glioma, Humans, Male, Memory, Meningioma, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Peptide Fragments, Biomarkers, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review