The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EEG-Based Emotion Recognition: A State-of-the-Art Review of Current Trends and Opportunities
Open accessAbstract
Emotions are fundamental for human beings and play an important role in human cognition. Emotion is commonly associated with logical decision making, perception, human interaction, and to a certain extent, human intelligence itself. With the growing interest of the research community towards establishing some meaningful “emotional” interactions between humans and computers, the need for reliable and deployable solutions for the identification of human emotional states is required. Recent developments in using electroencephalography (EEG) for emotion recognition have garnered strong interest from the research community as the latest developments in consumer-grade wearable EEG solutions can provide a cheap, portable, and simple solution for identifying emotions. Since the last comprehensive review was conducted back from the years 2009 to 2016, this paper will update on the current progress of emotion recognition using EEG signals from 2016 to 2019. The focus on this state-of-the-art review focuses on the elements of emotion stimuli type and presentation approach, study size, EEG hardware, machine learning classifiers, and classification approach. From this state-of-the-art review, we suggest several future research opportunities including proposing a different approach in presenting the stimuli in the form of virtual reality (VR). To this end, an additional section devoted specifically to reviewing only VR studies within this research domain is presented as the motivation for this proposed new approach using VR as the stimuli presentation device. This review paper is intended to be useful for the research community working on emotion recognition using EEG signals as well as for those who are venturing into this field of research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9 · Cited by 9,538
Constants across cultures in the face and emotion.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0030377 · Cited by 5,509
DEAP: A Database for Emotion Analysis ;Using Physiological Signals
Koelstra, S., Muhl, C., Soleymani, M., Lee, J.-S., Yazdani, A., Ebrahimi, T., Pun, T., Nijholt, A., & Patras, I. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2011.15 · Cited by 5,093
The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention.
Lang, P. J. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.50.5.372 · Cited by 2,746
Ekman, P. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.99.3.550 · Cited by 2,372
Mauss, I. B., & Robinson, M. D. (2009) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930802204677 · Cited by 2,078
A Multimodal Database for Affect Recognition and Implicit Tagging
Soleymani, M., Lichtenauer, J., Pun, T., & Pantic, M. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2011.25 · Cited by 1,664
EEG Emotion Recognition Using Dynamical Graph Convolutional Neural Networks
Song, T., Zheng, W., Song, P., & Cui, Z. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2018.2817622 · Cited by 1,597
The contextual brain: implications for fear conditioning, extinction and psychopathology
Maren, S., Phan, K. L., & Liberzon, I. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3492 · Cited by 1,547
Plutchik, R. (2001) · American Scientist · doi:10.1511/2001.4.344 · Cited by 1,419
Cited by
EEG Based Emotion Recognition: A Tutorial and Review
Li, X., Zhang, Y., Tiwari, P., Song, D., Hu, B., Yang, M., Zhao, Z., Kumar, N., & Marttinen, P. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3524499 · Cited by 508
Emotion recognition in EEG signals using deep learning methods: A review
Jafari, M., Shoeibi, A., Khodatars, M., Bagherzadeh, S., Shalbaf, A., García, D. L., Gorriz, J. M., & Acharya, U. R. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107450 · Cited by 240
Automated emotion recognition: Current trends and future perspectives
Maithri, M., Raghavendra, U., Gudigar, A., Samanth, J., Barua, P. D., Murugappan, M., Chakole, Y., & Acharya, U. R. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106646 · Cited by 172
A State-of-the-Art Review of EEG-Based Imagined Speech Decoding
Lopez-Bernal, D., Balderas, D., Ponce, P., & Molina, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.867281 · Cited by 107
Jadhav, V., Tiwari, N., & Chawla, M. (2023) · ITM Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/itmconf/20235302011 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Suhaimi, N. S., Mountstephens, J., & Teo, J.
- Venue
- Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-09-16
- Volume
- 2020
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 1687-5265 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-5273
- OpenAlex
- W3087220290
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 41.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EEG-Based Emotion Recognition: A State-of-the-Art Review of Current Trends and Opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2020/8875426
- The paper
- Suhaimi, N. S., Mountstephens, J., & Teo, J. (2020). EEG-Based Emotion Recognition: A State-of-the-Art Review of Current Trends and Opportunities. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8875426
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.