CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 86Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityMedicinal Plant ResearchEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Yield, Quality, and Antioxidant Activity of Clove (Syzygium aromaticum L.) Bud Oil at the Different Phenological Stages in Young and Mature Trees

Open access
Alfikri, Faisal Nur, Pujiarti, Rini, Wibisono, Mochamat Gunawan, Hardiyanto, Eko Bhakti·2020·Scientifica
DOI 10.1155/2020/9701701PMC PMC7290900
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Buds and flowers of clove (Syzygium aromaticumL.) are economically important essential oil sources. The purpose of this study was to assess the yield, quality, and antioxidant activity of Zanzibar clove bud oil between three phenological stages (budding-3, full-budding, and flowering) in young (3-4 years) and mature trees (45 years). Chemical compositions of the oil were analyzed using GC-MS, and the physicochemical properties were measured based on SNI 06-4267-1996. Antioxidant activity was analyzed using the DPPH method. The results showed flowering buds of young trees produced higher yield (16.73%) than that of the mature ones (14.93%). The GC-MS analysis showed that the main bioactive compound of clove oil was eugenol (68.05–82.38%), which is highest at the flowering stage in mature trees. Almost all of the clove bud oils met physicochemical properties standard required by the SNI 06-4267-1996. DPPH scavenging activity IC50ranged 15.80–108.85 µg/mL, with the highest antioxidant activity at the flowering stage of young trees. The results indicate that clove at flowering stage produced the best essential oil ingredient, as well as the most efficient source of natural antioxidants with slight differences in quality between the young and mature trees.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2020/9701701

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Yield of clove oil from three replications. Same letter notation (a, b, etc) indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05) in each age group.
Figure 1 Yield of clove oil from three replications. Same letter notation (a, b, etc) indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05) in each age group.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 DPPH radical inhibition (%) of clove oil at different ages, phenological stages, and concentrations from three replications (p < 0.05).
Figure 2 DPPH radical inhibition (%) of clove oil at different ages, phenological stages, and concentrations from three replications (p < 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 DPPH IC50 (inhibitory concentration to reduce DPPH radical by 50%) of clove oil at different ages and phenological stages from three replications (p < 0.05).
Figure 3 DPPH IC50 (inhibitory concentration to reduce DPPH radical by 50%) of clove oil at different ages and phenological stages from three replications (p < 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 2013, International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2, 312
  2. 2012, Bulletin of Anatomy and Physiology, 20, 1
  3. 2013, ISSN Journal, 1, 87
  4. 2018, Journal of Food Chemistry, 276, 180

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Alfikri, F. N., Pujiarti, R., Wibisono, M. G., & Hardiyanto, E. B.
Affiliations
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Corresponding author
Pujiarti, Rini
ORCID
Venue
Scientifica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-03
Volume
2020
Pages
1-8
ISSN
2090-908X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1155/2020/9701701
PMC
PMC7290900
OpenAlex
W3032897427
Cited by
86
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Scientifica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
Syzygium aromaticum, essential oils, phenological stages, flowering stage, eugenol, antioxidant activity, DPPH radical scavenging, essential oil yield, essential oil quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review