The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Data Splitting on Performance of Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Shear Strength of Soil
Open accessAbstract
The main objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the performance of different machine learning (ML) algorithms, namely, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), and Boosting Trees (Boosted) algorithms, considering the influence of various training to testing ratios in predicting the soil shear strength, one of the most critical geotechnical engineering properties in civil engineering design and construction. For this aim, a database of 538 soil samples collected from the Long Phu 1 power plant project, Vietnam, was utilized to generate the datasets for the modeling process. Different ratios (i.e., 10/90, 20/80, 30/70, 40/60, 50/50, 60/40, 70/30, 80/20, and 90/10) were used to divide the datasets into the training and testing datasets for the performance assessment of models. Popular statistical indicators, such as Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Correlation Coefficient (R), were employed to evaluate the predictive capability of the models under different training and testing ratios. Besides, Monte Carlo simulation was simultaneously carried out to evaluate the performance of the proposed models, taking into account the random sampling effect. The results showed that although all three ML models performed well, the ANN was the most accurate and statistically stable model after 1000 Monte Carlo simulations (Mean R = 0.9348) compared with other models such as Boosted (Mean R = 0.9192) and ELM (Mean R = 0.8703). Investigation on the performance of the models showed that the predictive capability of the ML models was greatly affected by the training/testing ratios, where the 70/30 one presented the best performance of the models. Concisely, the results presented herein showed an effective manner in selecting the appropriate ratios of datasets and the best ML model to predict the soil shear strength accurately, which would be helpful in the design and engineering phases of construction projects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications
Huang, G.-B., Zhu, Q.-Y., & Siew, C.-K. (2006) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126 · Cited by 13,285
A working guide to boosted regression trees
Elith, J., Leathwick, J. R., & Hastie, T. (2008) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x · Cited by 6,484
Extreme Learning Machine for Regression and Multiclass Classification
Huang, G.-B., Zhou, H., Ding, X., & Zhang, R. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2011.2168604 · Cited by 5,550
Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detection
Mohanty, S. P., Hughes, D. P., & Salathé, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01419 · Cited by 5,026
Extreme learning machine: a new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks
Huang, G.-B., Zhu, Q.-Y., & Siew, C.-K. (2005) · 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2004.1380068 · Cited by 4,084
Principles of Geotechnical Engineering
Das, B. M. (2020) · Cited by 1,828
Residual strength of clays in landslides, folded strata and the laboratory
Skempton, A. W. (1985) · Géotechnique · doi:10.1680/geot.1985.35.1.3 · Cited by 895
A survey of machine learning for big data processing
Qiu, J., Wu, Q., Ding, G., Xu, Y., & Feng, S. (2016) · EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing · doi:10.1186/s13634-016-0355-x · Cited by 894
Heung, B., Ho, H. C., Zhang, J., Knudby, A., Bulmer, C. E., & Schmidt, M. G. (2016) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.014 · Cited by 530
Chen, W., Li, Y., Xue, W., Shahabi, H., Li, S., Hong, H., Wang, X., Bian, H., Zhang, S., Pradhan, B., et al. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134979 · Cited by 505
Cited by
Ho, L. S., & Tran, V. Q. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133587 · Cited by 77
Self-citationJoseph, N. T., Schwichtenberg, T., Cao, D., Jones, G. D., Rodowa, A. E., Barlaz, M. A., Charbonnet, J. A., Higgins, C. P., Field, J. A., & Helbling, D. E. (2023) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c03770 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, Q. H., Ly, H.-B., Ho, L. S., Al-Ansari, N., Le, H. V., Tran, V. Q., Prakash, I., & Pham, B. T.
- Venue
- Mathematical Problems in Engineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-02-05
- Volume
- 2021
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 1024-123X (ISSN-L)
- 1563-5147
- OpenAlex
- W3128290931
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 79.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Data Splitting on Performance of Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Shear Strength of Soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2021/4832864
- The paper
- Nguyen, Q. H., Ly, H.-B., Ho, L. S., Al-Ansari, N., Le, H. V., Tran, V. Q., Prakash, I., & Pham, B. T. (2021). Influence of Data Splitting on Performance of Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Shear Strength of Soil. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4832864
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.