Cited by 28Enzyme Production and CharacterizationAnimal Diversity and Health StudiesProteins in Food Systems

Camel Milk-Clotting Using Plant Extracts as a Substitute to Commercial Rennet

Open access
Fguiri, Imen, Atigui, Moufida, Sboui, Amel, Samira, Arroum, Marzougui, Chayma, Dbara, Mohamed, Hammadi, Mohamed, Khorchani, Touhami·2021·Journal of Chemistry

Abstract

The transformation of camel milk into cheese is an operation considered very delicate because of several difficulties encountered in achieving coagulation. The present study aims to improve coagulation abilities of camel milk using enzyme extracts from pineapple, kiwi, and ginger. Our results concerning the characterization of the enzymatic extract showed an extraction yield that varies according to the type of extract (pineapple: 75.28% ± 4.59, kiwi: 63.97% ± 5.22, and ginger: 28.64% ± 1.47). The optimum coagulation conditions of the 3 types of extract were as follows: for pineapple: pH = 5 and temperature = 45°C; for kiwifruit: pH = 6.6 and temperature = 40°C; and for ginger: pH = 6.6 and temperature = 45°C. A fresh cheese was made from camel milk with a particular nutritional quality and consistency. The kiwi proteases displayed chymosin-like properties and thus hold the best potential for use as a milk coagulant in cheese production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2021/6680246

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cheese made with kiwi extract showed a better texture and had the highest scores in sensory evaluation compared with other extracts.

    “Furthermore, the cheese made with the kiwi extract showed a better texture and had the highest scores in the test of sensory evaluation compared with other extracts.”

    From Plant Milk-Clotting Enzymes for Cheesemaking (2022) · cites this paper as [59]

  • Kiwi extract determined the highest yield (20.71%) in camel milk cheesemaking.

    “The data reported that kiwi extract determined the highest yield (20.71%).”

    From Plant Milk-Clotting Enzymes for Cheesemaking (2022) · cites this paper as [59]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 28

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Z. Farah, Camel Milk Properties, SKAT, Sweden, 1st edition, 1996.
  2. AFNOR, Contrôle de la Qualité des Produits Alimentaires: Lait et Produits Laitiers : Analyses Physicochimiques, p. 581, 4th edition, AFNOR, Paris, France, 1993.
  3. J. L. Bergere and J. Lenoir, "Les accidents de fromagerie et les défauts des fromages," in Le Fromage, A. Eck and J. C. Gillis, Eds., pp. 509-541, Tec & Doc Lavoisier, Paris, France, 3rd edition, 1997.
  4. J. P. Ramet, Production de Fromages à Partir de Lait de Chamelle en Tunisie, pp. 1-33, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1989.
  5. J. P. Ramet, "Technologie comparée des différents types de caillés," in Le Fromage, A. Eck and J. C. Gillis, Eds., pp. 333-364, Technique & Documentation-Lavoisier, Paris, France, 1997.
  6. R. Veisseyre, Technologie du Lait: Constitution, Récolte, Traitement et Transformation du Lait, pp. 9-33, La Maison Rustique, Paris, France, 1979.
  7. S. T. Benani, "Valorisation et optimisation de l'utilisation d'un coagulant végétal pour la fabrication d'un fromage tradi- tionnel: composition and characteristics of camel milk," Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 60, no. 1993, pp. 603-626, 2017.

Authors
Fguiri, I., Atigui, M., Sboui, A., Samira, A., Marzougui, C., Dbara, M., Hammadi, M., & Khorchani, T.
Affiliations
  • Institut des Régions Arides (TN)
  • University of Carthage (TN)
  • Livestock and Wild Life Laboratory, Arid Land Institute (IRA), Medenine 4119, Tunisia
Corresponding author
Fguiri, Imen
Venue
Journal of Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-05
Volume
2021
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 2090-9063 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-9071
OpenAlex
W3133518383
Cited by
28
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Animal Diversity and Health Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
camel milk, milk coagulation, plant proteases, pineapple extract, ginger extract, cheese production, rennet substitute, extraction yield, coagulation conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review