Using healthcare resources wisely: a predictive support system regarding the severity of patient falls
Open accessAbstract
Background: An injurious fall is one of the main indicators of care quality in healthcare facilities. Despite several fall screen tools being widely used to evaluate a patient's fall risk, they are frequently unable to reveal the severity level of patient falls. The purpose of this study is to build a practical system useful to predict the severity level of in-hospital falls. This practice is done in order to better allocate limited healthcare resources and to improve overall patient safety. Methods: Four hundred and forty-six patients who experienced fall events at a large Taiwanese hospital were referenced. Eight predictors were used to ascertain the severity of patient falls solely based on the above study population. Multinomial logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, random forest, support vector machine, eXtreme gradient boosting, deep learning, and ensemble learning were adopted to establish predictive models. Accuracy, F1 score, precision, and recall were utilized to assess the models' performance. Results: Compared to other learners, random forest exhibited satisfying predictive performance in terms of all metrics (accuracy: 0.844, F1 score: 0.850, precision: 0.839, and recall: 0.875 for the test dataset), and it was adopted as the base learner for a severity-level predictive system which is web-based. Furthermore, age, ability of independent activity, patient sources, use of assistive devices, and fall history within the past 12 months were deemed the top five important risk factors for evaluating fall severity. Conclusions: The application of machine learning techniques for predicting the severity level of patient falls may result in some benefits to monitor fall severity and to better allocate limited healthcare resources.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wang et al. random forest algorithm for predicting severity of damage following a patient fall proved best with an accuracy of 0.844 and precision of 0.839.
“Several machine learning algorithms were used, with the random forest algorithm proving the best with an accuracy of 0.844 and precision of 0.839.”
From Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming patient safety with intelligent systems—A systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [65]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- [2]Hou W. H. Kang C. M. Ho M. H. Kuo J. M. C. Chen H. L. Chang W. Y. Evaluation of an inpatient fall risk screening tool to identify the most critical fall risk factors in inpatients Journal of Clinical Nursing 2017 26 5-6 698 706 10.1111/jocn.13510 2-s2.0-85006320675 27533486 · DOI
- [3]Jung H. Park H. A. Testing the predictive validity of the Hendrich II fall risk model Western Journal of Nursing Research 2018 40 12 1785 1799 10.1177/0193945918766554 2-s2.0-85044578341 29577823 · DOI
- [4]Najafpour Z. Godarzi Z. Arab M. Yaseri M. Risk factors for falls in hospital in-patients: a prospective nested case control study International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2019 8 5 300 306 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.11 2-s2.0-85067054785 31204446 PMC6571495 · DOI
- [5]ZhaoZhao Y. L. Bott M. He J. Kim H. Park S. H. Dunton N. Evidence on fall and injurious fall prevention interventions in acute care hospitals The Journal of Nursing Administration: The Journal of Nursing Administration 2019 49 2 86 92 10.1097/nna.0000000000000715 2-s2.0-85060227044 30633063 · DOI
- [6]Lesser A. Israni J. Kent T. Ko K. J. Association between physical therapy in the emergency department and emergency department revisits for older adult fallers: a nationally representative analysis Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2018 66 11 2205 2212 10.1111/jgs.15469 2-s2.0-85053264178 30132800 · DOI
- [7]Sri-on J. Tirrell G. P. Bean J. F. Lipsitz L. A. Liu S. W. Revisit, subsequent hospitalization, recurrent fall, and death within 6 Months after a fall among elderly emergency department patients Annals of Emergency Medicine 2017 70 4 516 521 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.05.023 2-s2.0-85021802410 28688769 · DOI
- [8]Morse J. M. Morse R. M. Tylko S. J. Development of a scale to identify the fall-prone patient Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement 2010 8 4 366 377 10.1017/S0714980800008576 2-s2.0-0024951758 · DOI
- [9]Oliver D. Britton M. Seed P. Martin F. C. Hopper A. H. Development and evaluation of evidence based risk assessment tool (STRATIFY) to predict which elderly inpatients will fall: case-control and cohort studies BMJ 1997 315 7115 1049 1053 10.1136/bmj.315.7115.1049 9366729 PMC2127684 · DOI
- [10]Hendrich A. L. Bender P. S. Nyhuis A. Validation of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model: a large concurrent case/control study of hospitalized patients Applied Nursing Research 2003 16 1 9 21 10.1053/apnr.2003.yapnr2 2-s2.0-0037308974 12624858 · DOI
- [12]Marella W. M. Sparnon E. Finley E. Screening electronic health record-related patient safety reports using machine learning Journal of Patient Safety 2017 13 1 31 36 10.1097/pts.0000000000000104 2-s2.0-84897955248 24721977 · DOI
- [13]Wang Y. Coiera E. Runciman W. Magrabi F. Using multiclass classification to automate the identification of patient safety incident reports by type and severity BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2017 17 1 p. 84 10.1186/s12911-017-0483-8 2-s2.0-85020443373 PMC5468980 28606174 · DOI
- [14]Wang L. Xue Z. Ezeana C. F. Preventing inpatient falls with injuries using integrative machine learning prediction: a cohort study Npj Digital Medicine 2019 2 1 p. 127 10.1038/s41746-019-0200-3 PMC6908660 31872067 · DOI
- [15]Wang Y. Coiera E. Magrabi F. Using convolutional neural networks to identify patient safety incident reports by type and severity Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2019 26 12 1600 1608 10.1093/jamia/ocz146 31730700 PMC7647259 · DOI
- [16]Liu J. Wong Z. S. Y. So H. Y. Tsui K. L. Evaluating resampling methods and structured features to improve fall incident report identification by the severity level Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2021 28 8 1756 1764 10.1093/jamia/ocab048 34010385 PMC8324236 · DOI
- [17]Cho E. H. Woo Y. J. Han A. Chung Y. C. Kim Y. H. Park H. A. Comparison of the predictive validity of three fall risk assessment tools and analysis of fall‐risk factors at a tertiary teaching hospital Journal of Clinical Nursing 2020 29 17-18 3482 3493 10.1111/jocn.15387 32564439 · DOI
- [18]Cimilli OzturkCimilli Ozturk T. Ak R. Unal Akoglu E. Onur O. Eroglu S. Saritemur M. Factors associated with multiple falls among elderly patients admitted to emergency department International Journal of Gerontology 2017 11 2 85 89 10.1016/j.ijge.2016.05.009 2-s2.0-85019924082 · DOI
- [19]Aryee E. James S. L. Hunt G. M. Ryder H. F. Identifying protective and risk factors for injurious falls in patients hospitalized for acute care: a retrospective case-control study BMC Geriatrics 2017 17 1 p. 260 10.1186/s12877-017-0627-9 2-s2.0-85032981108 29115921 PMC5678557 · DOI
- [20]Stevens J. A. Sogolow E. D. Gender differences for non-fatal unintentional fall related injuries among older adults Injury Prevention 2005 11 2 115 119 10.1136/ip.2004.005835 2-s2.0-17744369260 15805442 PMC1730193 · DOI
- [21]Chen Y. C. Chien S. F. Chen L. K. Risk factors associated with falls among Chinese hospital inpatients in Taiwan Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2009 48 2 132 136 10.1016/j.archger.2007.11.006 2-s2.0-58349091568 18207582 · DOI
- [22]Kuhn M. Johnson K. Applied Predictive Modeling 2013 Berlin, Germany Springer 10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3 2-s2.0-84995523796 · DOI · Paper page
- [23]Ong M. S. Magrabi F. Coiera E. Automated identification of extreme-risk events in clinical incident reports Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2012 19 e1 e110 e118 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000562 2-s2.0-84863550886 22237865 PMC3392867 · DOI
- [24]Marschollek M. Gövercin M. Rust S. Mining geriatric assessment data for in-patient fall prediction models and high-risk subgroups BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2012 12 1 p. 19 10.1186/1472-6947-12-19 2-s2.0-84858031637 PMC3314576 22417403 · DOI
- [25]Cheng F. Zhao Z. Machine learning-based prediction of drug-drug interactions by integrating drug phenotypic, therapeutic, chemical, and genomic properties Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2014 21 e2 e278 e286 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002512 2-s2.0-84908145917 24644270 PMC4173180 · DOI
- [26]Fong A. Adams K. T. Gaunt M. J. Howe J. L. Kellogg K. M. Ratwani R. M. Identifying health information technology related safety event reports from patient safety event report databases Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2018 86 135 142 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.007 2-s2.0-85053459923 30213556 · DOI
- [27]Comfort S. Perera S. Hudson Z. Sorting through the safety data haystack: using machine learning to identify individual case safety reports in social-digital media Drug Safety 2018 41 6 579 590 10.1007/s40264-018-0641-7 2-s2.0-85042121685 29446035 PMC5966485 · DOI
- [28]Liu J. Wong Z. S. Y. Tsui K. L. So H. Y. Kwok A. Exploring Hidden In-Hospital Fall Clusters from Incident Reports Using Text Analytics MEDINFO 2019: Health and Wellbeing E-Networks For All 2019 Amsterdam, The Netherlands IOS Press 1526 1527 10.3233/SHTI190517 2-s2.0-85071511274 31438214 · DOI
- [29]Evans H. P. Anastasiou A. Edwards A. Automated classification of primary care patient safety incident report content and severity using supervised machine learning (ML) approaches Health Informatics Journal 2019 26 4 3123 3139 10.1177/1460458219833102 2-s2.0-85062702543 30843455 · DOI
- [32]Van Rossum G. Drake F. L. Python 3 Reference Manual 2009 Scotts Valley, CA CreateSpace 10.5555/1593511 · DOI
- [33]Pedregosa F. Varoquaux G. Gramfort A. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python Journal of Machine Learning Research 2011 12 2825 2830
- [34]Alghamdi M. Al-Mallah M. Keteyian S. Brawner C. Ehrman J. Sakr S. Predicting diabetes mellitus using SMOTE and ensemble machine learning approach: the Henry Ford ExercIse Testing (FIT) project PLoS One 2017 12 7 e0179805 10.1371/journal.pone.0179805 2-s2.0-85025430136 PMC5524285 28738059 · DOI
- [35]Chen C. H. Huang W. T. Tan T. H. Chang C. C. Chang Y. J. Using K-nearest neighbor classification to diagnose abnormal lung sounds Sensors 2015 15 6 13132 13158 10.3390/s150613132 2-s2.0-84930965751 26053756 PMC4507578 · DOI
- [36]Simsekler M. C. E. Rodrigues C. Qazi A. Ellahham S. Ozonoff A. A comparative study of patient and staff safety evaluation using tree-based machine learning algorithms Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2021 208 107416 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107416 · DOI · Paper page
- [37]Szyc Ł. Hillen U. Scharlach C. Kauer F. Garbe C. Diagnostic performance of a support vector machine for dermatofluoroscopic melanoma recognition: the results of the retrospective clinical study on 214 pigmented skin lesions Diagnostics 2019 9 3 p. 103 10.3390/diagnostics9030103 2-s2.0-85072606875 PMC6787620 31450697 · DOI
- [39]Chawla N. V. Bowyer K. W. Hall L. O. Kegelmeyer W. P. Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2002 16 321 357 10.1613/jair.953 · DOI · Paper page
- [40]Sokolova M. Lapalme G. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks Information Processing & Management 2009 45 4 427 437 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 2-s2.0-65649138430 · DOI · Paper page
- [41]Sundararajan M. Najmi A. The Many Shapley Values for Model Explanation Proceedings of the Paper presented at the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning July 2020 New York, United States 10.5555/3524938.3525797 · DOI
- [44]Shankar K. N. Lin F. Epino H. Temin E. Liu S. Emergency department falls: a longitudinal analysis of revisits and hospitalisations between patients who fall and patients who did not fall BMJ Open 2020 10 12 e041054 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041054 PMC7733199 33303454 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
De Micco, F., Di Palma, G., Ferorelli, D., De Benedictis, A., Tomassini, L., Tambone, V., Cingolani, M., & Scendoni, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1522554 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, H.-H., Huang, C.-C., Talley, P. C., & Kuo, K.-M.
- Affiliations
- E-Da Hospital (TW)
- I-Shou University (TW)
- National United University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Kuo, Kuang-Ming
- Venue
- Journal of Healthcare Engineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-08-01
- Volume
- 2022
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 2040-2295 (ISSN-L)
- 2040-2309
- PMC
- PMC9359836
- OpenAlex
- W4289318117
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Healthcare Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- patient falls, inpatient falls, fall risk assessment, healthcare resource allocation, patient safety, fall risk factors, assistive devices, fall history, random forest
- MeSH terms
- Accidental Falls, Machine Learning, Bayes Theorem, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Infant, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review