The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Privacy-Preserving Crowd Flow Prediction Framework Based on Federated Learning during Epidemics
Open accessAbstract
Predicting and managing the movement of people in a region during epidemics’ outbreak is an important step in preventing outbreaks. The protection of user privacy during the outbreak has become a matter of public concern in recent years, yet deep learning models based on datasets collected from mobile devices may pose privacy and security issues. Therefore, how to develop an accurate crowd flow prediction while preserving privacy is a significant problem to be solved, and there is a tradeoff between these two objectives. In this paper, we propose a privacy-preserving mobility prediction framework via federated learning (CFPF) to solve this problem without significantly sacrificing the prediction performance. In this framework, we designed a deep and embedding learning approach called “Multi-Factors CNN-LSTM” (MFCL) that can help to explicitly learn from human trajectory data (weather, holidays, temperature, and POI) during epidemics. Furthermore, we improve the existing federated learning framework by introducing a clustering algorithm to classify clients with similar spatio-temporal characteristics into the same cluster, and select servers at the center of the cluster as edge central servers to integrate the optimal model for each cluster and improve the prediction accuracy. To address the privacy concerns, we introduce local differential privacy into the FL framework which can facilitate collaborative learning with uploaded gradients from users instead of sharing users’ raw data. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on a realistic crowd flow dataset to evaluate the performance of our CFPF and make a comparison with other existing models. The experimental results demonstrate that our solution can not only achieve accurate crowd flow prediction but also provide a strong privacy guarantee at the same time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The authors in [148] proposed an enhanced FL framework that integrates clustering algorithms to manage human trajectory data. Their method improved both the efficiency and accuracy of FL-based crowd mobility predictions.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [148]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. Y. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.05629 · Cited by 14,215
Learning Differentially Private Recurrent Language Models
McMahan, H. B., Ramage, D., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.06963 · Cited by 849
Accelerating Federated Learning via Momentum Gradient Descent
Liu, W., Chen, L., Chen, Y., & Zhang, W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2020.2975189 · Cited by 374
Ferrag, M. A., Friha, O., Maglaras, L., Janicke, H., & Shu, L. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3118642 · Cited by 342
Towards Fair and Privacy-Preserving Federated Deep Models
Lyu, L., Yu, J., Nandakumar, K., Li, Y., Ma, X., Jin, J., Yu, H., & Ng, K. S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2020.2996273 · Cited by 250
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- 10.1126/science.abb3221 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abb2762 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109754 · DOI
- Y. Jiang, 2020, Clinical data on hospital environmental hygiene monitoring and medical staff protection during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak, medRxiv, 23, 57
- 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1115717 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02541 · DOI
- D. Easley, 2012, Networks, crowds, and markets: reasoning about a highly connected world[J], Significance, 9, 43
- 10.1098/rstb.2004.1490 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0308344101 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1134695 · DOI
- 10.1109/jas.2021.1004087 · DOI
- J. Zhang, 2016, Dnn-based prediction model for spatio-temporal data, 1, 10.1145/2996913.2997016 · DOI
- J. Zhang, 2017, Deep spatio-temporal residual networks for citywide crowd flows prediction, Thirty-first AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 76, 98
- 10.1109/tkde.2019.2891537 · DOI
- 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011020 · DOI
- 10.1109/access.2018.2866364 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.027 · DOI
- 10.1109/access.2019.2950956 · DOI
- 10.1109/tits.2019.2900481 · DOI
- 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015668 · DOI
- 10.1109/IJCNN.2018.8489600 · DOI
- S. Madan, A novel technique for privacy preservation using k-anonymization and nature inspired optimization algorithms, 10.2139/ssrn.3357276 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCPS.2014.6843714 · DOI
- 10.3390/s150100248 · DOI
- 10.1109/tnse.2020.3014455 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijgi8100440 · DOI
- Y. Shi, 2019, A survey of hybrid deep learning methods for traffic flow prediction, 133, 10.1145/3373419.3373429 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.002 · DOI
- X. Yin, 2021, Deep learning on traffic prediction: methods, analysis and future directions, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 76, 754
- 10.3390/s19092059 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0968-090x(97)82903-8 · DOI
- 10.3141/1678-22 · DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2003)129:6(664) · DOI
- 10.1609/aaai.v27i1.8577 · DOI
- 10.3141/1776-25 · DOI
- 10.1109/tits.2012.2200474 · DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1991)117:2(178) · DOI
- 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015668 · DOI
- 10.3390/s17071501 · DOI
- J. Zhang, 2017, Deep spatio-temporal residual networks for citywide crowd flows prediction, Thirty-first AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 76, 199
- 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011020 · DOI
- J. Sun, 2020, Predicting citywide crowd flows in irregular regions using multi-view graph convolutional networks, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 98, 45
- 10.1109/access.2020.3009876 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.05.041 · DOI
- 10.1109/tvt.2015.2436395 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ins.2016.12.050 · DOI
- 10.1109/tifs.2019.2929409 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/mnet.2019.1800229 · DOI
- 10.3390/electronics9050773 · DOI
- 10.1145/3381006 · DOI
- 10.1109/jiot.2020.3037194 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/jiot.2020.2991416 · DOI · Paper page
- M. E. Andrés, 2013, Geo-indistinguishability: differential privacy for location-based systems, Corr, 34
- N. E. Bordenabe, 2014, Optimal geo-indistinguishable mechanisms for location privacy, Proc. ACM CCS, 251
- 10.1109/TIFS.2017.2779402 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0034487 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICNIDC.2016.7974565 · DOI
- H. S. Hota, 2017, Time series data prediction using sliding window based RBF neural network[J], International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 13, 1145
- 10.1109/access.2019.2936454 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13673-018-0141-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.future.2017.07.013 · DOI
- H. Sak, 2014, Long short-term memory recurrent neural network architectures for large scale acoustic modeling, Proc.15th Annu. Conf. Int. Speech Commun. Assoc., 1
- B. McMahan, 2017, Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data, 1273
- J. Zhang, 2016, Deep spatio-temporal residual networks for citywide crowd flows prediction, Spatio, 65, 8689
- X. Shi, 2015, Convolutional LSTM network: a machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting, MIT Press, 123, 199
- M. Khashei, 2010, An artificial neural network model for timeseries forecasting, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 479, 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.044 · DOI
- Y. Wang, 2019, Origin-destination matrix prediction via graph convolution: a new perspective of passenger demand modeling, GEML, 986, 1644
- J. Zhang, 2016, Deep spatio-temporal residual networks for citywide crowd flows prediction, Deep, 144, 65
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Islam, N., & Zulkernine, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01089 · Cited by 9
“It also mentions how these techniques can be applied are applied in the context of ML-based IoV applications.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, W., Yang, G., Bao, L., Ma, K., & Zhou, H.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- China Telecom (China) (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Geng
- Venue
- Security and Communication Networks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-10-26
- Volume
- 2022
- Pages
- 1-20
- ISSN
- 1939-0114 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0122
- OpenAlex
- W4307561043
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Security and Communication Networks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61972209, KYCX180891, BK20160916, 2016M601859, 61872197, BK20161516)
- Government of Jiangsu Province
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (KYCX18_0891, BK20160916, 61972209, 2016M601859, BK20161516, 61872197)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
- Keywords
- crowd flow prediction, privacy-preserving machine learning, federated learning, epidemics, differential privacy, CNN-LSTM, spatiotemporal clustering, edge servers, mobile device data, mobility prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review