Cited by 4Fungal Plant Pathogen ControlYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity

Biological Control Mechanisms of Non‐Saccharomyces Yeasts against Filamentous Fungal Pathogens within Rosaceae Family

Open access
Da Costa Arruda, Giseli Cristina, Kovács, Mónika, Pomázi, Andrea·2024·International Journal of Agronomy

Abstract

Pathogenic fungi can cause significant annual losses in the quality and quantity of fruits belonging to Rosaceae family during pre‐ and postharvest. Synthetic fungicides are considered the main method for controlling diseases in food crops; however, they pose a great risk to human health and to the environment. As a result, biological control methods, which are based on living microorganisms to reduce the population or to inhibit the growth of pathogens, have arisen as a safe alternative. In this review, we highlight the principal mechanisms (e.g., nutrition and space competition, mycoparasitism, induced resistance and growth enhancement, production of volatile organic compounds, and antibiosis) utilized by the most frequently reported non‐Saccharomyces biocontrol agents (BCAs) yeasts: Meyerozyma guilliermondii , Pichia membranifaciens , Wickerhamomyces anomalus , Metschnikowia pulcherrima , Hanseniaspora uvarum , and Aureobasidium pullulans , against the common pathogenic fungi found within Rosaceae family: Penicillium expansum , Botrytis cinerea , and Monilinia spp. Understanding BCAs’ importance and mode of action is a necessary step in order to reduce the detrimental effect of spoilage fungi in the agriculture and food industry, by achieving a more sustainable and safer control of them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2024/1538220

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 111 · Cited by 4

Authors
Da Costa Arruda, G. C., Kovács, M., & Pomázi, A.
Affiliations
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU)
Corresponding author
Pomázi, Andrea
Venue
International Journal of Agronomy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-01
Volume
2024
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1687-8159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-8167
OpenAlex
W4402412953
Cited by
4
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Agronomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Tempus Közalapítvány
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Keywords
biological control, non-Saccharomyces yeasts, biological control agents, Rosaceae, Penicillium expansum, Botrytis cinerea, Monilinia, mycoparasitism, induced resistance, volatile organic compounds, antibiosis, growth promotion, Candida guilliermondii, Pichia membranifaciens, Wickerhamomyces anomalus, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Aureobasidium pullulans, postharvest fruit disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review