Biological Control Mechanisms of Non‐Saccharomyces Yeasts against Filamentous Fungal Pathogens within Rosaceae Family
Open accessAbstract
Pathogenic fungi can cause significant annual losses in the quality and quantity of fruits belonging to Rosaceae family during pre‐ and postharvest. Synthetic fungicides are considered the main method for controlling diseases in food crops; however, they pose a great risk to human health and to the environment. As a result, biological control methods, which are based on living microorganisms to reduce the population or to inhibit the growth of pathogens, have arisen as a safe alternative. In this review, we highlight the principal mechanisms (e.g., nutrition and space competition, mycoparasitism, induced resistance and growth enhancement, production of volatile organic compounds, and antibiosis) utilized by the most frequently reported non‐Saccharomyces biocontrol agents (BCAs) yeasts: Meyerozyma guilliermondii , Pichia membranifaciens , Wickerhamomyces anomalus , Metschnikowia pulcherrima , Hanseniaspora uvarum , and Aureobasidium pullulans , against the common pathogenic fungi found within Rosaceae family: Penicillium expansum , Botrytis cinerea , and Monilinia spp. Understanding BCAs’ importance and mode of action is a necessary step in order to reduce the detrimental effect of spoilage fungi in the agriculture and food industry, by achieving a more sustainable and safer control of them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-Saccharomyces yeasts are promising biocontrol agents due to their adaptability, broad pathogen suppression, and suitability for industrial use.
“Non-Saccharomyces yeasts are promising biocontrol agents (BCAs) due to their adaptability, broad pathogen suppression, and suitability for industrial use”
From Yeast to the rescue: <i>Meyerozyma guilliermondii</i> primes tomato vigor and resistance to Fusarium crown and root rot (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
M. guilliermondii has a direct antifungal effect, antagonizing fungal pathogens through a lectin-like interaction resulting in strong adhesion to fungal hyphae and pathogen cell lysis.
“Considering the direct antifungal effect of M. guilliermondii, which antagonizes fungal pathogens through a lectin-like interaction resulting in strong adhesion to the fungal hyphae and pathogen cell lysis,18”
From Yeast to the rescue: <i>Meyerozyma guilliermondii</i> primes tomato vigor and resistance to Fusarium crown and root rot (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 111 · Cited by 4
- Authors
- Da Costa Arruda, G. C., Kovács, M., & Pomázi, A.
- Affiliations
- Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU)
- Corresponding author
- Pomázi, Andrea
- Venue
- International Journal of Agronomy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-01
- Volume
- 2024
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1687-8159 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-8167
- OpenAlex
- W4402412953
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 111
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Agronomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Tempus Közalapítvány
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Keywords
- biological control, non-Saccharomyces yeasts, biological control agents, Rosaceae, Penicillium expansum, Botrytis cinerea, Monilinia, mycoparasitism, induced resistance, volatile organic compounds, antibiosis, growth promotion, Candida guilliermondii, Pichia membranifaciens, Wickerhamomyces anomalus, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Aureobasidium pullulans, postharvest fruit disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review