Lower Toxicity of the Essential Oils With Repellent Potential Compared to Diethyltoluamide and Cypermethrin on Porcellio laevis
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the acute toxicity of essential oils with repellent potential, diethyltoluamide (DEET), and cypermethrin on Porcellio laevis. Methods: Randomized preclinical trial with a factorial and controlled arrangement on three essential oils ( Eucalyptus globulus , Mentha piperita , and Cymbopogon citratus ) at 0.1%, 1%, and 10%, respectively, DEET at 10% and cypermethrin at 0.1%. Each experimental group consisted of 10 specimens, 2–3‐mm‐long, of P. laevis . Toxicity was measured by specimen mortality at 3, 24, and 48 h postexposure. Nonparametric inferential statistics were used to compare mortality between the groups. The InfoStat/E software, Version 2020, was used for analysis. Results: Essential oils at concentrations of 0.1% and 1% showed similar toxicity to each other (mortality of 10%–20%) but significantly lower compared to cypermethrin and DEET (mortality of 100%). However, essential oils at 10% reached median mortality rates above 70%. Likewise, similar effects were observed at concentrations of 0.1% and 1.0% and at 24 and 48 h. The LC 50 at 24 h was 7.8% (CI 95%: 5.2–9.8), 6.1% (CI 95%: 4.9–7.4), and 9.8% (CI 95%: 8.9–10.6) for E. globulus , M. piperita , and C. citratus, respectively. Conclusions: The evaluated essential oils showed lower acute toxicity compared to DEET and cypermethrin, depending on concentration and time.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Silva-Díaz, H., Serrato-Monja, A. V., Arriaga-Deza, E. V., & Becerra-Gutiérrez, L. K.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de San Martín de Porres (PE)
- Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruíz Gallo (PE)
- Corresponding author
- Silva-Díaz, Heber
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Toxicology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-01
- Volume
- 2025
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6638848-6638848
- ISSN
- 1687-8191 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-8205
- PMC
- PMC12767039
- OpenAlex
- W7117685830
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Toxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
- Keywords
- essential oils, Porcellio laevis, acute toxicity, repellents, DEET, cypermethrin, Eucalyptus globulus, peppermint, Cymbopogon citratus, LC50, mortality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review