Cited by 122Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Inhibitory Deficits, Delay Aversion and Preschool AD/HD:Implications for the Dual Pathway Model

Open access
Dalen, Lindy, Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J. S., Hall, Martin, Remington, Bob·2004·Neural Plasticity

Abstract

The dual pathway model proposes the existence of separate and neurobiologically distinct cognitive (inhibitory and more general executive dysfunction) and motivational (delay aversion) developmental routes to AD/HD. The study reported in this paper explores the relation between inhibitory deficits and delay aversion and their association with AD/HD in a group of three‐year‐old children. Children identified as having a pre‐school equivalent of AD/HD (N=19) and controls (N=19), matched for gender and IQ, completed a battery of inhibition and delay tasks. Correlational and factor analysis supported a dissociation between inhibitory deficits (go‐no‐go, set shifting) and delay aversion (choice delay) with delay of gratification cross‐loading. Children with AD/HD displayed more inhibitory deficits and were more delay averse than controls. The data support the value of the distinction between motivational and cognitive pathways to AD/HD. Furthermore, the data suggest that such a distinction is apparent relatively early on during development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/np.2004.1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 122

Authors
Dalen, L., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Hall, M., & Remington, B.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Dalen, Lindy
Venue
Neural Plasticity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
11
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 1687-5443 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-5904
OpenAlex
W2058160427
Cited by
122
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neural Plasticity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, preschool children, inhibitory deficits, delay aversion, dual-pathway model, executive dysfunction, delay of gratification, go/no-go task, set-shifting, cognitive pathways, early development
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Avoidance Learning, Child, Preschool, Choice Behavior, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review