Cited by 55Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersChildren's Physical and Motor Development

Efficacy and Effectiveness of Physical Therapy in Enhancing Postural Control in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Open access
Harris, Susan R., Roxborough, Lori·2005·Neural Plasticity

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to conduct a systematic review of studies that examined the efficacy and effectiveness of postural control intervention strategies for children with CP. Only physical therapy interventions were included, e.g. adaptive seating devices, ankle foot orthoses, neurodevelopmental treatment. A multifaceted search strategy was employed to identify all potential studies published between 1990 and 2004. The search strategy included electronic databases, reference list scanning, author and citation tracking of relevant studies, and hand searching of pediatric physical therapy journals and conference proceedings. Twelve studies (1991–2004), comprising ten group design studies and two single subject studies, met our inclusion criteria. A variety of age ranges and severity of children with cerebral palsy (n = 132) participated in the studies. The study quality scores ranged from 2 to 7 (total possible range of 0 to 7) with a median score of 5.5 and a mode of 6. As was true in an earlier systematic review on adaptive seating, most of the 12 ‘experimental’ studies published since 1990 that were aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of postural control strategies provided lower levels of evidence, i.e. Sackett Levels III to V. Additional studies with stronger designs are needed to establish that postural control interventions for children with CP are effective.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/np.2005.229

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first systematic review of postural control interventions for children with CP was published by Harris and Roxborough in 2005.

    “In 2005, the first systematic review of postural control interventions for children with CP was published by Harris and Roxborough. 30”

    From Exercise interventions improve postural control in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review (2015) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction (pp. 229–230) identifies a 1995 systematic review by Roxborough on adaptive seating for children with CP, which the paper describes as an intervention for enhancing postural control. Harris and Roxborough say their 2005 review updates and expands that earlier review, so it was not the first systematic review of such interventions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The novelty of hippotherapy promotes extended engagement and the opportunity for massed practice of reactive postural adjustments.

    “The novelty of hippotherapy promotes extended engagement, and the opportunity for massed practice of reactive postural adjustments. 30”

    From Exercise interventions improve postural control in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review (2015) · cites this paper as [30]

    In the discussion following p. 240, the review reports improved postural sway after computer-generated saddle movements and says high-repetition postural perturbations show promise for reactive balance. It does not say that the novelty of hippotherapy extends engagement or that hippotherapy itself provides massed practice of reactive postural adjustments. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 55

Authors
Harris, S. R., & Roxborough, L.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children (CA)
Corresponding author
Harris, Susan R.
Venue
Neural Plasticity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
12
Issue
2-3
Pages
229-243
ISSN
  • 1687-5443 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-5904
OpenAlex
W2135380204
Cited by
55
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neural Plasticity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
cerebral palsy, postural control, physical therapy intervention, children, adaptive seating, ankle-foot orthosis, neurodevelopmental treatment, intervention efficacy, quality of evidence
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebral Palsy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Postural Balance, Hemiplegia, Humans, Movement Disorders, Physical Fitness, Databases, Bibliographic, Treatment Outcome, Physical Therapy Specialty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review