Academic Integrity in Canada: An Annotated Bibliography
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This report documents research and related materials related to academic integrity in Canada to inform and guide future work in the field. It provides an overview of the literature up to and including 2017 relating to academic integrity in Canada. Methods: Two research questions guided this literature review: 1. What scholarly, research, and professional literature showcases Canadian scholarship relating to academic integrity? 2. What major themes emerge from scholarly and research literature about academic integrity in the Canadian context? To this end, a methodical search of databases was undertaken, relevant research was compiled, and articles were summarized and categorized. Results: Our review and search of the literature resulted in 68 sources, which we organized into 7 categories: (a) Attitudes, behaviours, and perceptions; (b) Academic integrity in professional programs; (c) Understanding and supporting international students; (d) Pedagogical implications: Instruction and prevention; (e) Focus on technology; (f) Institutional considerations: Policy, law and case management, and (g) Methodological considerations: Plagiarism research. We found that academic dishonesty in Canada, as in other countries, is widespread among students and faculty, while policies and their implementation are often inconsistent. Calls for clearer guidelines and greater support for students and faculty resound as a consistent theme in the literature. Implications: Academic integrity research in Canada has been slow to develop, but is now experiencing significant growth. As more stakeholders become aware of the scope and complexities of academic integrity, many researchers are making recommendations for policy, policy implementation, and support through technology, education, and intervention programs. Additional materials: 72 References Keywords: Academic integrity, academic dishonesty, academic misconduct, plagiarism, cheating, Canada
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Eaton et al. (2019) outlined a set of previously identified fundamental values that, taken together, comprise academic integrity as opposed to clear definitions.
“In their recent annotated bibliography, Eaton et al. (2019) built on the work of others by outlining a set of previously identified fundamental values (International Center for Academic Integrity, 2021) that when taken together, comprise academic integrity as opposed to clear definitions.”
From Accountability, Relationality and Indigenous Epistemology: Advancing an Indigenous Perspective on Academic Integrity (2022) · cites this paper as Eaton et al. (2019)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lindstrom, G. E. (2022) · Ethics and integrity in educational contexts · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_6 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Faculty as street-level bureaucrats: discretionary decision-making in the era of generative AI
Alsharefeen, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1662657 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Strachan, R., Oguna, C., & Oruche, U. (2024) · 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon60312.2024.10578821 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eaton, S. E., Crossman, K., & Edino, R.
- Venue
- Werklund School of Education
- Publisher
- Werklund School of Education
- Published
- 2019-04-02
- OpenAlex
- W2935554223
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
- Keywords
- academic integrity, academic dishonesty, academic misconduct, plagiarism, cheating, academic integrity policy, institutional policy implementation, international students, professional programs, academic integrity education, Canada
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review