Data from Delineating the RAS Conformational Landscape
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-0804 · Paper page
Abstract
Abstract Mutations in RAS isoforms (KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS) are among the most frequent oncogenic alterations in many cancers, making these proteins high priority therapeutic targets. Effectively targeting RAS isoforms requires an exact understanding of their active, inactive, and druggable conformations. However, there is no structural catalog of RAS conformations to guide therapeutic targeting or examining the structural impact of RAS mutations. Here we present an expanded classification of RAS conformations based on analyses of the catalytic switch 1 (SW1) and switch 2 (SW2) loops. From 721 human KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS structures available in the Protein Data Bank (206 RAS–protein cocomplexes, 190 inhibitor-bound, and 325 unbound, including 204 WT and 517 mutated structures), we created a broad conformational classification based on the spatial positions of Y32 in SW1 and Y71 in SW2. Clustering all well-modeled SW1 and SW2 loops using a density-based machine learning algorithm defined additional conformational subsets, some previously undescribed. Three SW1 conformations and nine SW2 conformations were identified, each associated with different nucleotide states (GTP-bound, nucleotide-free, and GDP-bound) and specific bound proteins or inhibitor sites. The GTP-bound SW1 conformation could be further subdivided on the basis of the hydrogen bond type made between Y32 and the GTP γ-phosphate. Further analysis clarified the catalytic impact of G12D and G12V mutations and the inhibitor chemistries that bind to each druggable RAS conformation. Overall, this study has expanded our understanding of RAS structural biology, which could facilitate future RAS drug discovery. Significance:Analysis of >700 RAS structures helps define an expanded landscape of active, inactive, and druggable RAS conformations, the structural impact of common RAS mutations, and previously uncharacterized RAS inhibitor–binding modes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Biochemical and Structural Analysis of Common Cancer-Associated KRAS Mutations
Hunter, J. C., Manandhar, A., Carrasco, M. A., Gurbani, D., Gondi, S., & Westover, K. D. (2015) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-15-0203 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Drugging an undruggable pocket on KRAS
Kessler, D., Gmachl, M., Mantoulidis, A., Martin, L. J., Zoephel, A., Mayer, M., Gollner, A., Covini, D., Fischer, S., Gerstberger, T., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1904529116 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
A new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations
North, B., Lehmann, A., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2011) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.030 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Defining a new nomenclature for the structures of active and inactive kinases
Modi, V., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1814279116 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Self-citationKRAS G13D sensitivity to neurofibromin-mediated GTP hydrolysis
Rabara, D., Tran, T. H., Dharmaiah, S., Stephens, R. M., McCormick, F., Simanshu, D. K., & Holderfield, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1908353116 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
KRAS-specific inhibition using a DARPin binding to a site in the allosteric lobe
Bery, N., Legg, S., Debreczeni, J., Breed, J., Embrey, K., Stubbs, C., Kolasinska-Zwierz, P., Barrett, N., Marwood, R., Watson, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10419-2 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Parker, M. I., Meyer, J. E., Golemis, E. A., & Dunbrack
- Affiliations
- Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dunbrack,, Roland L.
- Published
- 2023-03-31
- OpenAlex
- W4361823422
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (CA006927)
- National Cancer Institute (CA 006927, P30CA006927)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM122517)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
- Keywords
- Ras, KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, GTP-bound state, RAS mutations, G12D mutation, G12V mutation, RAS inhibitors, inhibitor binding mode
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review