The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gene Expression Profiling Identifies Molecular Subtypes of Inflammatory Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Comprehensive gene expression profiles obtained using DNA microarrays have revealed previously indistinguishable subtypes of noninflammatory breast cancer (NIBC) related to different features of mammary epithelial biology and significantly associated with survival. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare, particular, and aggressive form of disease. Here we have investigated whether the five molecular subtypes described for NIBC (luminal A and B, basal, ERBB2 overexpressing, and normal breast-like) were also present in IBC. We monitored the RNA expression of ∼8,000 genes in 83 breast tissue samples including 37 IBC, 44 NIBC, and 2 normal breast samples. Hierarchical clustering identified the five subtypes of breast cancer in both NIBC and IBC samples. These subtypes were highly similar to those defined in previous studies and associated with similar histoclinical features. The robustness of this classification was confirmed by the use of both alternative gene set and analysis method, and the results were corroborated at the protein level. Furthermore, we show that the differences in gene expression between NIBC and IBC and between IBC with and without pathologic complete response that we have recently reported persist in each subtype. Our results show that the expression signatures defining molecular subtypes of NIBC are also present in IBC. Obtained using different patient series and different microarray platforms, they reinforce confidence in the expression-based molecular taxonomy but also give evidence for its universality in breast cancer, independently of a specific clinical form.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms
Hu, Z., Fan, C., Oh, D. S., Marron, J., He, X., Qaqish, B. F., Livasy, C., Carey, L. A., Reynolds, E., Dressler, L., et al. (2006) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-96 · Cited by 1,491
Geeleher, P., Cox, N. J., & Huang, R. S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r47 · Cited by 890
Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience?
Carey, L., Winer, E., Viale, G., Cameron, D., & Gianni, L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.154 · Cited by 783
Molecular heterogeneity of breast carcinomas and the cancer stem cell hypothesis
Stingl, J., & Caldas, C. (2007) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2212 · Cited by 470
How basal are triple‐negative breast cancers?
Bertucci, F., Finetti, P., Cervera, N., Esterni, B., Hermitte, F., Viens, P., & Birnbaum, D. (2008) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.23518 · Cited by 443
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertucci, F., Finetti, P., Rougemont, J., Charafe-Jauffret, E., Cervera, N., Tarpin, C., Nguyen, C., Xerri, L., Houlgatte, R., Jacquemier, J., Viens, P., & Birnbaum, D.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2005-03-15
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2170-2178
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2158118614
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene Expression Profiling Identifies Molecular Subtypes of Inflammatory Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-4115
- The paper
- Bertucci, F., Finetti, P., Rougemont, J., Charafe-Jauffret, E., Cervera, N., Tarpin, C., Nguyen, C., Xerri, L., Houlgatte, R., Jacquemier, J., Viens, P., & Birnbaum, D. (2005). Gene Expression Profiling Identifies Molecular Subtypes of Inflammatory Breast Cancer. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-4115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.