Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic and Epigenetic Analysis of von Hippel-Lindau ( VHL ) Gene Alterations and Relationship with Clinical Variables in Sporadic Renal Cancer

Banks, Rosamonde E., Tirukonda, Prasanna, Taylor, Claire, Hornigold, Nick, Astuti, Dewi, Cohen, Dena, Maher, Eamonn R., Stanley, Anthea J., Harnden, Patricia, Joyce, Adrian, Knowles, Margaret, Selby, Peter J.·2006·Cancer Research

Abstract

Genetic and epigenetic changes in the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor gene are common in sporadic conventional renal cell carcinoma (cRCC). Further insight into the clinical significance of these changes may lead to increased biological understanding and identification of subgroups of patients differing prognostically or who may benefit from specific targeted treatments. We have comprehensively examined the VHL status in tissue samples from 115 patients undergoing nephrectomy, including 96 with sporadic cRCC. In patients with cRCC, loss of heterozygosity was found in 78.4%, mutation in 71%, and promoter methylation in 20.4% of samples. Multiplex ligation–dependent probe amplification identified intragenic copy number changes in several samples including two which were otherwise thought to be VHL-noninvolved. Overall, evidence of biallelic inactivation was found in 74.2% of patients with cRCC. Many of the mutations were novel and approximately two-thirds were potentially truncating. Examination of these and other published findings confirmed mutation hotspots affecting codons 117 and 164, and revealed a common region of mutation in codons 60 to 78. Gender-specific differences in methylation and mutation were seen, although not quite achieving statistical significance (P = 0.068 and 0.11), and a possible association between methylation and polymorphism was identified. No significant differences were seen between VHL subgroups with regard to clinicopathologic features including stage, grade, tumor size, cancer-free and overall survival, with the exception of a significant association between loss of heterozygosity and grade, although a possible trend for survival differences based on mutation location was apparent. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(4): 2000-11)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3074

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Banks, R. E., Tirukonda, P., Taylor, C., Hornigold, N., Astuti, D., Cohen, D., Maher, E. R., Stanley, A. J., Harnden, P., Joyce, A., Knowles, M., & Selby, P. J.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2006-02-15
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
2000-2011
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2156038562
Cited by
275
References
1
FWCI
15.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic and Epigenetic Analysis of von Hippel-Lindau ( VHL ) Gene Alterations and Relationship with Clinical Variables in Sporadic Renal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3074
The paper
Banks, R. E., Tirukonda, P., Taylor, C., Hornigold, N., Astuti, D., Cohen, D., Maher, E. R., Stanley, A. J., Harnden, P., Joyce, A., Knowles, M., & Selby, P. J. (2006). Genetic and Epigenetic Analysis of von Hippel-Lindau ( VHL ) Gene Alterations and Relationship with Clinical Variables in Sporadic Renal Cancer. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3074

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.