The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GRP78 as a Novel Predictor of Responsiveness to Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
Abstract
The discovery of predictive factors for chemoresistance is critical for improving adjuvant therapy for cancer patients. The 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78), widely used as an indicator of the unfolded protein response (UPR), is induced in the tumor microenvironment. In vitro studies suggest that GRP78 confers chemoresistance to topoisomerase inhibitors, such as Adriamycin (doxorubicin). Here, we report on a retrospective cohort study of 127 stage II and III breast cancer patients who were treated with Adriamycin-based chemotherapy. Archival tumor specimens were available for analysis and the relationship of GRP78 expression level to “time to recurrence” (TTR), used as a surrogate marker for drug resistance, was examined. Our data show that 67% of the study subjects expressed high level of GRP78 in their tumors before the initiation of chemotherapy and suggest an association between GRP78 positivity and shorter TTR [hazard ratio (HR), 1.78; P = 0.16]. Interestingly, subgroup analysis reveals that the HR for the GRP78-positive group increased significantly among patients who did not receive further taxane treatment (HR, 3.00; P = 0.022) and among mastectomy patients (HR, 3.33; P = 0.027). The HR was even stronger among mastectomy patients who did not receive further taxane treatment (HR, 4.82; P = 0.010). The use of GRP78 as a predictor for chemoresponsiveness and the potential interaction of GRP78 and/or the UPR pathways with taxanes warrant larger studies. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(16): 7849-53)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fernandez, P. M., Tabbara, S. O., Jacobs, L. K., Manning, F. C. R., Tsangaris, T. N., Schwartz, A. M., Kennedy, K. A., & Patierno, S. R. (2000) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1023/a:1006332011207 · Cited by 338
ER Stress, Hypoxia Tolerance and Tumor Progression
Koumenis, C. (2006) · Current Molecular Medicine · doi:10.2174/156652406775574604 · Cited by 231 · cited 1×
“Recent evidence shows that the microenvironment of tumors represents physiologic endoplasmic reticulum stress, and the UPR is crucial for survival of tumor cells subjected to persistent hypoxia (5).”
Cited by
Endoplasmic reticulum stress signals in the tumour and its microenvironment
Chen, X., & Cubillos-Ruiz, J. R. (2021) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-00312-2 · Cited by 1,356
Glucose-regulated proteins in cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential
Lee, A. S. (2014) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3701 · Cited by 587
Self-citationEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress Signaling in Cancer Cells
Oakes, S. A. (2020) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.01.010 · Cited by 397
Dong, D., Ni, M., Li, J., Xiong, S., Ye, W., Virrey, J. J., Mao, C., Ye, R., Wang, M., Pen, L., et al. (2008) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2950 · Cited by 375
Self-citationEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress: Its Role in Disease and Novel Prospects for Therapy
Schönthal, A. H. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/857516 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, E., Nichols, P., Spicer, D., Groshen, S., Yu, M. C., & Lee, A. S.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2006-08-15
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 7849-7853
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2072185042
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GRP78 as a Novel Predictor of Responsiveness to Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-1660
- The paper
- Lee, E., Nichols, P., Spicer, D., Groshen, S., Yu, M. C., & Lee, A. S. (2006). GRP78 as a Novel Predictor of Responsiveness to Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-1660
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.