Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Preclinical Evaluation of EC145, a Folate-Vinca Alkaloid Conjugate

Open access
Reddy, Joseph A., Dorton, Ryan, Westrick, Elaine, Dawson, Alicia, Smith, Terri, Xu, Le-Cun, Vetzel, Marilynn, Kleindl, Paul, Vlahov, Iontcho R., Leamon, Christopher P.·2007·Cancer Research

Abstract

We recently developed a new group of folate-conjugated Vinca alkaloids, one of which, EC145, emerged as a candidate for clinical development. Brief treatment of nude mice bearing ∼100 mm3 folate receptor-positive human xenografts led to complete response (CR) in 5/5 mice and cures (i.e., remission without a relapse for >90 days post-tumor implantation) in 4/5 mice. Multiple CRs and cures were also noted when EC145 was used to treat mice initially bearing tumors as large as 750 mm3. Likewise, complete cures (5/5) resulted following the treatment of an aggressive folate receptor–positive J6456 lymphoma model. The activity of EC145 was not accompanied by noticeable weight loss or major organ tissue degeneration. Furthermore, no significant antitumor activity (0/5 CR) was observed in EC145-treated animals that were co-dosed with an excess of a benign folate ligand, thus demonstrating the target-specific activity of EC145. The enhanced therapeutic index due to folate conjugation was also evidenced by the fact that the unconjugated drug (desacetylvinblastine monohydrazide) was found to be completely inactive when administered at nontoxic dose levels and only marginally active when given at highly toxic dose levels. Subsequent dose regimen studies confirmed that EC145 given on a more frequent, qdx5 schedule resulted in the most effective antitumor response as compared with an equivalent total dose given on thrice- or single-injection-per-week schedule. Taken together, these studies show that EC145 has significant antiproliferative activity and tolerability, thus lending support to an ongoing phase 1 trial for the treatment of advanced malignancies. [Cancer Res 2007;67(9):4434–42]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-0033

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Reddy, J. A., Dorton, R., Westrick, E., Dawson, A., Smith, T., Xu, L.-C., Vetzel, M., Kleindl, P., Vlahov, I. R., & Leamon, C. P.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2007-05-01
Volume
67
Issue
9
Pages
4434-4442
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2140853963
Cited by
176
References
0
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preclinical Evaluation of EC145, a Folate-Vinca Alkaloid Conjugate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-0033
The paper
Reddy, J. A., Dorton, R., Westrick, E., Dawson, A., Smith, T., Xu, L.-C., Vetzel, M., Kleindl, P., Vlahov, I. R., & Leamon, C. P. (2007). Preclinical Evaluation of EC145, a Folate-Vinca Alkaloid Conjugate. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-0033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.