TREK-1 Is a Novel Molecular Target in Prostate Cancer
Abstract
TREK-1 is a two-pore domain (K2P) potassium channel that carries a leak current that is time- and voltage-independent. Recently, potassium channels have been related to cell proliferation and some K2P family channels, such as TASK-3, have been shown to be overexpressed in specific neoplasms. In this study, we addressed the expression of TREK-1 in prostatic tissues and cell lines, and we have found that this potassium channel is highly expressed in prostate cancer but is not expressed in normal prostate nor in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Furthermore, expression of TREK-1 correlates strongly with the grade and the stage of the disease, suggesting a causal link between channel expression and abnormal cell proliferation. In vitro studies showed that TREK-1 is highly expressed in PC3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cell lines but is not detectable in normal prostate epithelial cells (NPE). In this report, we show that overexpression of TREK-1 in NPE and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells leads to a significant increase in proliferation. Moreover, the increased cell proliferation rate of PC3 cells and TREK-1 overexpressing CHO cells could be reduced when TREK-1 current was reduced by overexpression of a dominant-negative TREK-1 mutant or when cells were exposed to a TREK-1 inhibitor. Taken together, these data suggest that TREK-1 expression is associated with abnormal cell proliferation and may be a novel marker for and a molecular target in prostate cancer. [Cancer Res 2008;68(4):1197–203]
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The two-pore domain K+ channel, TREK1, increases proliferation of PC-3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cells.
“The two-pore domain K+ channel, TREK1, increases proliferation of PC-3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cells (Voloshyna et al., 2008).”
From Membrane potential and cancer progression (2013) · cites this paper as Voloshyna et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 104
- Authors
- Voloshyna, I., Besana, A., Castillo, M., Matos, T., Weinstein, I. B., Mansukhani, M., Robinson, R. B., Cordon-Cardo, C., & Feinmark, S. J.
- Affiliations
- 1Pharmacology, Departments of
- 2Pathology, and
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2008-02-15
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1197-1203
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2083839003
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P50 CA92629, P50CA092629)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
- Keywords
- TREK-1, two-pore domain potassium channels, prostate cancer, cell proliferation, molecular targets, benign prostatic hyperplasia, tumor stage and grade, PC-3 cells, LNCaP cells, dominant-negative mutant, biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Adenoviridae, Animals, Cricetulus, Cricetinae, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Transfection, CHO Cells, Potassium Channels, Tandem Pore Domain, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Growth Processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review