Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cancer Stem Cells Contribute to Cisplatin Resistance in Brca1/p53 –Mediated Mouse Mammary Tumors

Open access
Shafee, Norazizah, Smith, Christopher R., Wei, Shuanzeng, Kim, Yoon, Mills, Gordon B., Hortobagyi, Gabriel N., Stanbridge, Eric J., Lee, Eva Y-H. P.·2008·Cancer Research

Abstract

The majority of BRCA1-associated breast cancers are basal cell–like, which is associated with a poor outcome. Using a spontaneous mouse mammary tumor model, we show that platinum compounds, which generate DNA breaks during the repair process, are more effective than doxorubicin in Brca1/p53–mutated tumors. At 0.5 mg/kg of daily cisplatin treatment, 80% primary tumors (n = 8) show complete pathologic response. At greater dosages, 100% show complete response (n = 19). However, after 2 to 3 months of complete remission following platinum treatment, tumors relapse and become refractory to successive rounds of treatment. Approximately 3.8% to 8.0% (mean, 5.9%) of tumor cells express the normal mammary stem cell markers, CD29hi24med, and these cells are tumorigenic, whereas CD29med24−/lo and CD29med24hi cells have diminished tumorigenicity or are nontumorigenic, respectively. In partially platinum-responsive primary transplants, 6.6% to 11.0% (mean, 8.8%) tumor cells are CD29hi24med; these populations significantly increase to 16.5% to 29.2% (mean, 22.8%; P < 0.05) in platinum-refractory secondary tumor transplants. Further, refractory tumor cells have greater colony-forming ability than the primary transplant–derived cells in the presence of cisplatin. Expression of a normal stem cell marker, Nanog, is decreased in the CD29hi24med populations in the secondary transplants. Top2A expression is also down-regulated in secondary drug-resistant tumor populations and, in one case, was accompanied by genomic deletion of Top2A. These studies identify distinct cancer cell populations for therapeutic targeting in breast cancer and implicate clonal evolution and expansion of cancer stem-like cells as a potential cause of chemoresistance. [Cancer Res 2008;68(9):3243–50]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-5480

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Shafee, N., Smith, C. R., Wei, S., Kim, Y., Mills, G. B., Hortobagyi, G. N., Stanbridge, E. J., & Lee, E. Y.-H. P.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2008-05-01
Volume
68
Issue
9
Pages
3243-3250
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2051204314
Cited by
308
References
4
FWCI
12.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Stem Cells Contribute to Cisplatin Resistance in Brca1/p53 –Mediated Mouse Mammary Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-5480
The paper
Shafee, N., Smith, C. R., Wei, S., Kim, Y., Mills, G. B., Hortobagyi, G. N., Stanbridge, E. J., & Lee, E. Y.-H. P. (2008). Cancer Stem Cells Contribute to Cisplatin Resistance in Brca1/p53 –Mediated Mouse Mammary Tumors. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-5480

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.