Cited by 82Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysDNA Repair MechanismsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

B-MYB Is Required for Recovery from the DNA Damage–Induced G2 Checkpoint in p53 Mutant Cells

Mannefeld, Mirijam, Klassen, Elena, Gaubatz, Stefan·2009·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In response to DNA damage, several signaling pathways that arrest the cell cycle in G1 and G2 are activated. The down-regulation of mitotic genes contributes to the stable maintenance of the G2 arrest. The human LINC or DREAM complex, together with the B-MYB transcription factor, plays an essential role in the expression of G2-M genes. Here, we show that DNA damage results in the p53-dependent binding of p130 and E2F4 to LINC and the dissociation of B-MYB from LINC. We find that B-MYB fails to dissociate from LINC in p53 mutant cells, that this contributes to increased G2-M gene expression in response to DNA damage in these cells, and, importantly, that B-MYB is required for recovery from the G2 DNA damage checkpoint in p53-negative cells. Reanalysis of microarray expression data sets revealed that high levels of B-MYB correlate with a p53 mutant status and an advanced tumor stage in primary human breast cancer. Taken together, these data suggest that B-MYB/LINC plays an important role in the DNA damage response downstream of p53. [Cancer Res 2009;69(9):4073–80]

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-4156

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DREAM complex is stabilized and recruited to target gene promoters when p21 is activated by p53.

    “Further, the DREAM complex is stabilized and recruited to target gene promoters when p21 is activated by p53.107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114”

    From Census and evaluation of p53 target genes (2017) · cites this paper as [107]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 82

Authors
Mannefeld, M., Klassen, E., & Gaubatz, S.
Affiliations
University of Würzburg (DE)
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2009-04-30
Volume
69
Issue
9
Pages
4073-4080
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2056454005
Cited by
82
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
B-Myb, LINC complex, DREAM complex, G2 checkpoint, DNA damage response, TP53 mutation, p130, E2F4, checkpoint recovery, breast cancer, tumor stage
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, DNA Damage, Doxorubicin, Humans, Mutation, Nuclear Proteins, Protein Binding, Repressor Proteins, Trans-Activators, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, G2 Phase, Cell Cycle Proteins, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, HCT116 Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, Crk-Associated Substrate Protein, Kv Channel-Interacting Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review