The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Primary Xenograft Model of Small-Cell Lung Cancer Reveals Irreversible Changes in Gene Expression Imposed by Culture In vitro
Open accessAbstract
Traditional approaches to the preclinical investigation of cancer therapies rely on the use of established cell lines maintained in serum-based growth media. This is particularly true of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), where surgically resected tissue is rarely available. Recent attention has focused on the need for better models that preserve the integrity of cancer stem cell populations, as well as three-dimensional tumor-stromal interactions. Here we describe a primary xenograft model of SCLC in which endobronchial tumor specimens obtained from chemo-naive patients are serially propagated in vivo in immunodeficient mice. In parallel, cell lines grown in conventional tissue culture conditions were derived from each xenograft line, passaged for 6 months, and then reimplanted to generate secondary xenografts. Using the Affymetrix platform, we analyzed gene expression in primary xenograft, xenograft-derived cell line, and secondary xenograft, and compared these data to similar analyses of unrelated primary SCLC samples and laboratory models. When compared with normal lung, primary tumors, xenografts, and cell lines displayed a gene expression signature specific for SCLC. Comparison of gene expression within the xenograft model identified a group of tumor-specific genes expressed in primary SCLC and xenografts that was lost during the transition to tissue culture and that was not regained when the tumors were reestablished as secondary xenografts. Such changes in gene expression may be a common feature of many cancer cell culture systems, with functional implications for the use of such models for preclinical drug development. [Cancer Res 2009;69(8):3364–71]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Smyth, G. K. (2004) · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1027 · Cited by 11,829
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Murray, T., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2007) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43 · Cited by 7,439
Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms
Irizarry, R. A., Warren, D., Spencer, F., Kim, I. F., Biswal, S., Frank, B. C., Gabrielson, E., Garcia, J. G. N., Geoghegan, J., Germino, G., et al. (2005) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth756 · Cited by 862
Cited by
Patient-Derived Xenograft Models: An Emerging Platform for Translational Cancer Research
Hidalgo, M., Amant, F., Biankin, A. V., Budinská, E., Byrne, A. T., Caldas, C., Clarke, R. B., de Jong, S., Jonkers, J., Mælandsmo, G. M., et al. (2014) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-14-0001 · Cited by 1,742
Patient-derived tumour xenografts as models for oncology drug development
Tentler, J. J., Tan, A. C., Weekes, C. D., Jimeno, A., Leong, S., Pitts, T. M., Arcaroli, J. J., Messersmith, W. A., & Eckhardt, S. G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.61 · Cited by 1,277
Nunes, A. S., Barros, A. S., Costa, E. C., Moreira, A. F., & Correia, I. J. (2019) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.26845 · Cited by 721
Patient-derived xenografts undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution
Ben-David, U., Ha, G., Tseng, Y.-Y., Greenwald, N. F., Oh, C., Shih, J., McFarland, J. M., Wong, B., Boehm, J. S., Beroukhim, R., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3967 · Cited by 716
Temporal dynamics and genetic control of transcription in the human prefrontal cortex
Colantuoni, C., Lipska, B. K., Ye, T., Hyde, T. M., Tao, R., Leek, J. T., Colantuoni, E. A., Elkahloun, A. G., Herman, M. M., Weinberger, D. R., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10524 · Cited by 685
Metadata
- Authors
- Daniel, V. C., Marchionni, L., Hierman, J. S., Rhodes, J. T., Devereux, W. L., Rudin, C. M., Yung, R., Parmigiani, G., Dorsch, M., Peacock, C. D., & Watkins, D. N.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2009-04-15
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3364-3373
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2122147796
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Primary Xenograft Model of Small-Cell Lung Cancer Reveals Irreversible Changes in Gene Expression Imposed by Culture In vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-4210
- The paper
- Daniel, V. C., Marchionni, L., Hierman, J. S., Rhodes, J. T., Devereux, W. L., Rudin, C. M., Yung, R., Parmigiani, G., Dorsch, M., Peacock, C. D., & Watkins, D. N. (2009). A Primary Xenograft Model of Small-Cell Lung Cancer Reveals Irreversible Changes in Gene Expression Imposed by Culture In vitro. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-4210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
