The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deciphering the Impact of Common Genetic Variation on Lung Cancer Risk: A Genome-Wide Association Study
Open accessAbstract
To explore the impact of common variation on the risk of developing lung cancer, we conducted a two-phase genome-wide association (GWA) study. In phase 1, we compared the genotypes of 511,919 tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 1,952 cases and 1,438 controls; in phase 2, 30,568 SNPs were genotyped in 2,465 cases and 3,005 controls. SNP selection was based on best supported P values from phase 1 and two other GWA studies of lung cancer. In the combined analysis of phases 1 and 2, the strongest associations identified were defined by SNPs mapping to 15q25.1 (rs12914385; P = 3.19 × 10−16), 5p15.33 (rs4975616; P = 6.66 × 10−7), and 6p21.33 (rs3117582; P = 9.13 × 10−7). Variation at 15q25.1, but not 5p15.33 or 6p21.33, was strongly associated with smoking behavior with risk alleles correlated to higher consumption. Variation at 5p15.33 was shown to significantly influence induction of lung cancer histology. Pooling data from the four series provided 21,620 genotypes for 7,560 cases and 8,205 controls. A meta-analysis provided increased support that variation at 15q25.1 (rs8034191; P = 3.24 × 10−26), 5p15.33 (rs4975616; P = 2.99 × 10−9), and 6p21.33 (rs3117582; P = 4.46 × 10−10) influences lung cancer risk. The next best-supported associations were attained at 15q15.2 (rs748404: P = 1.08 × 10−6) and 10q23.31 (rs1926203; P = 1.28 × 10−6). These data indicate few common variants account for 1% of the excess familial risk underscoring the necessity of having additional large sample series for gene discovery. [Cancer Res 2009;69(16):6633–41]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lichtenstein, P., Holm, N. V., Verkasalo, P. K., Iliadou, A., Kaprio, J., Koskenvuo, M., Pukkala, E., Skytthe, A., & Hemminki, K. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200007133430201 · Cited by 4,114
A variant associated with nicotine dependence, lung cancer and peripheral arterial disease
Thorgeirsson, T. E., Geller, F., Sulem, P., Rafnar, T., Wiste, A., Magnusson, K. P., Manolescu, A., Thorleifsson, G., Stefansson, H., Ingason, A., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06846 · Cited by 1,523
Hung, R. J., McKay, J. D., Gaborieau, V., Boffetta, P., Hashibe, M., Zaridze, D., Mukeria, A., Szeszenia-Dabrowska, N., Lissowska, J., Rudnai, P., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06885 · Cited by 1,275
Cited by
Rare variants of large effect in BRCA2 and CHEK2 affect risk of lung cancer
Wang, Y., McKay, J. D., Rafnar, T., Wang, Z., Timofeeva, M. N., Broderick, P., Zong, X., Laplana, M., Wei, Y., Han, Y., et al. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3002 · Cited by 454
Self-citationSaccone, N. L., Culverhouse, R. C., Schwantes-An, T.-H., Cannon, D. S., Chen, X., Cichon, S., Giegling, I., Han, S., Han, Y., Keskitalo-Vuokko, K., et al. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001053 · Cited by 395
Self-citationHuang, Z., Sun, S., Lee, M., Maslov, A. Y., Shi, M., Waldman, S., Marsh, A., Siddiqui, T., Dong, X., Peter, Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01035-w · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Broderick, P., Wang, Y., Vijayakrishnan, J., Matakidou, A., Spitz, M. R., Eisen, T., Amos, C. I., & Houlston, R. S.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2009-08-12
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6633-6641
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2075040668
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deciphering the Impact of Common Genetic Variation on Lung Cancer Risk: A Genome-Wide Association Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-0680
- The paper
- Broderick, P., Wang, Y., Vijayakrishnan, J., Matakidou, A., Spitz, M. R., Eisen, T., Amos, C. I., & Houlston, R. S. (2009). Deciphering the Impact of Common Genetic Variation on Lung Cancer Risk: A Genome-Wide Association Study. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-0680
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.