Intrinsic Cooperation between p16INK4a and p21Waf1/Cip1 in the Onset of Cellular Senescence and Tumor Suppression In vivo
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Although the p16INK4a and p21Waf1/Cip1 cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors are known to play key roles in cellular senescence in vitro, their roles in senescence remain rather poorly understood in vivo. This situation is partly due to the possibility of compensatory effect(s) between p16INK4a and p21Waf1/Cip1 or to the upregulation of functionally related CDK inhibitors. To directly address the cooperative roles of p16INK4a and p21Waf1/Cip1 in senescence in vivo, we generated a mouse line simply lacking both p16INK4a and p21Waf1/Cip1 genes [double-knockout (DKO)]. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) derived from DKO mice displayed no evidence of cellular senescence when cultured serially in vitro. Moreover, DKO MEFs readily escaped Ras-induced senescence and overrode contact inhibition in culture. This was not the case in MEFs lacking either p16INK4a or p21Waf1/Cip1, indicating that p16INK4a and p21Waf1/Cip1 play cooperative roles in cellular senescence and contact inhibition in vitro. Notably, we found the DKO mice to be extremely susceptible to 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene/12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate–induced skin carcinogenesis that involves oncogenic mutation of the H-ras gene. Mechanistic investigations suggested that the high incidence of cancer in DKO mice likely reflected a cooperative effect of increased benign skin tumor formation caused by p21Waf1/Cip1 loss, with increased malignant conversion of benign skin tumors caused by p16INK4a loss. Our findings establish an intrinsic cooperation between p16INK4a and p21Waf1/Cip1 in the onset of cellular senescence and tumor suppression in vivo. Cancer Res; 70(22); 9381–90. ©2010 AACR.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both pathways are interlinked with extensive crosstalk.
“Both pathways are also interlinked with extensive crosstalk (Martín-Caballero et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2006; Yamakoshi et al., 2009).”
From Mechanisms of Cellular Senescence: Cell Cycle Arrest and Senescence Associated Secretory Phenotype (2021) · cites this paper as Martín-Caballero et al., 2001
Both p16 and p53 display compensatory interactions and both have a role in senescence initiation and maintenance.
“Both p16 and p53 display compensatory interactions [236], [237] and both have a role in senescence initiation and maintenance [79], [238], [239].”
From Redox control of senescence and age-related disease. (2017) · cites this paper as [236]
Increased expression of p21 has been implicated in induction of cellular senescence independent of p16.
“increased expression of p21 has been implicated in induction of cellular senescence independent of p16.44,45”
From Total body irradiation causes long-term mouse BM injury via induction of HSC premature senescence in an Ink4a- and Arf-independent manner (2014) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 136
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [19]19. Sharpless NE, Bardeesy N, Lee KH, et al. Loss of p16 INK4a with re- tention of p19 Arf predisposes mice to tumorigenesis. Nature 2001; 413:86-91.
- [30]30. Krimpenfort P, Ijpenberg A, Song JY, et al. p15 INK4b is a critical tumor suppressor in the absences of p16 INK4a . Nature 2007;448:943-6.
- Authors
- Takeuchi, S., Takahashi, A., Motoi, N., Yoshimoto, S., Tajima, T., Yamakoshi, K., Hirao, A., Yanagi, S., Fukami, K., Ishikawa, Y., Sone, S., Hara, E., & Ohtani, N.
- Affiliations
- Kanazawa University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Ohtani, Naoko
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2010-11-14
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 9381-9390
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2122549725
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21390290)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Keywords
- p16INK4a, p21, cellular senescence, tumor suppression, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, double knockout mice, Ras-induced senescence, contact inhibition, skin carcinogenesis, HRAS mutation, malignant transformation, benign skin tumor, mouse embryonic fibroblasts
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Cells, Cultured, Embryo, Mammalian, Fibroblasts, Histones, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Skin Neoplasms, Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate, 9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene, Blotting, Western, Cellular Senescence, Mice, Knockout, ras Proteins, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, RNA Interference, Cell Proliferation, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15, Octamer Transcription Factor-3, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review