Cited by 152Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsChromatin Remodeling and CancerAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Transcriptome analysis reveals that p53 and β-catenin alterations occur in a group of aggressive adrenocortical cancers

Open access
Ragazzon, Bruno, Libé, Rossella, Gaujoux, Sébastien, Assié, Guillaume, Fratticci, Amato, Launay, Pierre, Clauser, Eric, Bertagna, Xavier +3 more·2010·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare disease with an overall poor but heterogeneous prognosis. This heterogeneity could reflect different mechanisms of tumor development. Gene expression profiling by transcriptome analysis led to ACC being divided into two groups of tumors with very different outcomes. Somatic inactivating mutations of the tumor suppressor gene TP53 and activating mutations of the proto-oncogene β-catenin (CTNNB1) are the most frequent mutations identified in ACC. This study investigates the correlation between p53 and β-catenin alterations and the molecular classification of ACC by transcriptome analysis of 51 adult sporadic ACCs. All TP53 and CTNNB1 mutations seemed to be mutually exclusive and were observed only in the poor-outcome ACC group. Most of the abnormal p53 and β-catenin immunostaining was also found in this group. Fifty-two percent of the poor-outcome ACC group had TP53 or CTNNB1 mutations and 60% had abnormal p53 or β-catenin immunostaining. Unsupervised clustering transcriptome analysis of this poor-outcome group revealed three different subgroups, two of them being associated with p53 or β-catenin alterations, respectively. Analysis of p53 and β-catenin target gene expressions in each cluster confirmed a profound and anticipated effect on tumor biology, with distinct profiles logically associated with the respective pathway alterations. The third group had no p53 or β-catenin alteration, suggesting other unidentified molecular defects. This study shows the important respective roles of p53 and β-catenin in ACC development, delineating subgroups of ACC with different tumorigenesis and outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-2014

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activation of β-catenin as well as TP53 inactivation predicted poor outcome in one study of 51 samples.

    “Furthermore, activation of β-catenin as well as TP53 inactivation predicted poor outcome in one study of 51 samples (232).”

    From Adrenocortical carcinoma (2014) · cites this paper as [232]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 152

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P, Heitz PU. p53 mutations in sporadic adreno- cortical tumors. Int J Cancer 1993;54:408-10.

Authors
Ragazzon, B., Libé, R., Gaujoux, S., Assié, G., Fratticci, A., Launay, P., Clauser, E., Bertagna, X., Tissier, F., de Reyniès, A., & Bertherat, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Authors' Affiliations: 1Institut Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS (UMR 8104); 2Inserm, U1016; 3Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Department of Endocrinology, Reference Center for Rare Adrenal Diseases; 4INCa Comete Network; 5Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery; 6Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Department of Pathology; and 7Programme Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs, Ligue Nationale Contre Le Cancer, Paris, France
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2010-10-31
Volume
70
Issue
21
Pages
8276-8281
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2003721774
Cited by
152
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
15.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
adrenocortical carcinoma, TP53 mutation, CTNNB1 mutation, p53, β-catenin, gene expression profiling, tumor molecular classification, prognostic subgroups, tumor suppressor inactivation, proto-oncogene activation, p53 target genes, immunostaining
MeSH terms
Proto-Oncogene Mas, Humans, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Mutation, RNA, Messenger, Biomarkers, Tumor, Cohort Studies, Survival Rate, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Adrenocortical Carcinoma, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, beta Catenin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review