Cited by 122Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentBRCA gene mutations in cancerCancer-related Molecular Pathways

Perturbation of Rb, P53, and Brca1 or Brca2 Cooperate in Inducing Metastatic Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Open access
Szabova, Ludmila, Yin, Chaoying, Bupp, Sujata, Guerin, Theresa M., Schlomer, Jerome J., Householder, Deborah B., Baran, Maureen L., Yi, Ming +6 more·2012·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The majority of human high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (SEOC) is characterized by frequent mutations in p53 and alterations in the RB and FOXM1 pathways. A subset of human SEOC harbors a combination of germline and somatic mutations as well as epigenetic dysfunction for BRCA1/2. Using Cre-conditional alleles and intrabursal induction by Cre-expressing adenovirus in genetically engineered mice, we analyzed the roles of pathway perturbations in epithelial ovarian cancer initiation and progression. Inactivation of RB-mediated tumor suppression induced surface epithelial proliferation with progression to stage I carcinoma. Additional biallelic inactivation and/or missense p53 mutation in the presence or absence of Brca1/2 caused progression to stage IV disease. As in human SEOC, mice developed peritoneal carcinomatosis, ascites, and distant metastases. Unbiased gene expression and metabolomic profiling confirmed that Rb, p53, and Brca1/2-triple mutant tumors aligned with human SEOC, and not with other intraperitoneal cancers. Together, our findings provide a novel resource for evaluating disease etiology and biomarkers, therapeutic evaluation, and improved imaging strategies in epithelial ovarian cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-3834

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conditional knockout mice, using the Cre-lox system for cell type specificity, have been used to reproduce oncogenic mutations and homologous recombination defects to study ovarian cancer development and responses to clinically relevant treatments such as platinum-based drugs and PARP inhibitors.

    “Conditional knockout mice, using the Cre-lox system for cell type specificity, have been used to reproduce oncogenic mutations and HR defects to study ovarian cancer development and responses to clinically relevant treatments such as platin-based drugs and PARPis (Szabova et al., 2012; Perets et al., 2013; Szabova et al., 2014; Zhai et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 122

Authors
Szabova, L., Yin, C., Bupp, S., Guerin, T. M., Schlomer, J. J., Householder, D. B., Baran, M. L., Yi, M., Song, Y., Sun, W., McDunn, J. E., Martin, P. L., Van Dyke, T., & Difilippantonio, S.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Authors' Affiliations: 1Center for Advanced Preclinical Research, 2Advanced Biomedical Computing Center, SAIC at Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, 3Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, NCI-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland; 4Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; and 5Metabolon, Incorporated, Durham, North Carolina
Corresponding author
Difilippantonio, Simone
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2012-08-14
Volume
72
Issue
16
Pages
4141-4153
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2130330160
Cited by
122
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 3
FWCI
17.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (HHSN261200800001C)
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (HHSN261200800001E))
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
serous epithelial ovarian cancer, retinoblastoma protein, TP53 mutation, BRCA1, BRCA2, metastasis, peritoneal carcinomatosis, tumor progression, gene expression profiling, metabolite profiling, biomarkers
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Immunohistochemistry, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Retinoblastoma Protein, Gene Deletion, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review