The ISB Cancer Genomics Cloud: A Flexible Cloud-Based Platform for Cancer Genomics Research
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The ISB Cancer Genomics Cloud (ISB-CGC) is one of three pilot projects funded by the National Cancer Institute to explore new approaches to computing on large cancer datasets in a cloud environment. With a focus on Data as a Service, the ISB-CGC offers multiple avenues for accessing and analyzing The Cancer Genome Atlas, TARGET, and other important references such as GENCODE and COSMIC using the Google Cloud Platform. The open approach allows researchers to choose approaches best suited to the task at hand: from analyzing terabytes of data using complex workflows to developing new analysis methods in common languages such as Python, R, and SQL; to using an interactive web application to create synthetic patient cohorts and to explore the wealth of available genomic data. Links to resources and documentation can be found at www.isb-cgc.org. Cancer Res; 77(21); e7–10. ©2017 AACR.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 63
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [12]Melnik S Gubarev A Long JJ Romer G Shivakumar S Tolton M Dremel: Interactive Analysis of Web-Scale Datasets Proc. of the 36th Int'l Conf on Very Large Data Bases 2010 330 339
- [13]Wickham H Tidy Data Journal of Statistical Software 2014 59 10 1 23
- Authors
- Reynolds, S. M., Miller, M., Lee, P., Leinonen, K., Paquette, S. M., Rodebaugh, Z., Hahn, A., Gibbs, D. L., Slagel, J., Longabaugh, W. J., Dhankani, V., Reyes, M., Pihl, T., Backus, M., Bookman, M., Deflaux, N., Bingham, J., Pot, D., & Shmulevich, I.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Systems Biology (US)
- 2CSRA Inc., Falls Church, Virginia.
- Google (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reynolds, Sheila M.
- Shmulevich, Ilya
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2017-10-31
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- e7-e10
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- PMC
- PMC5780183
- OpenAlex
- W2765285264
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Cancer Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NCI NIH (HHSN261201400007C)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Keywords
- cloud computing, cancer genomics, data as a service, TCGA, targets, GENCODE, COSMIC, Google Cloud Platform, genomic data access, bioinformatics platform
- MeSH terms
- Cloud Computing, Humans, Neoplasms, Research, Software, United States, Genome, Human, Computational Biology, Internet, Genomics, National Cancer Institute (U.S.), Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review