3D deep learning from CT scans predicts tumor invasiveness of subcentimeter pulmonary adenocarcinomas
Abstract
Identification of early-stage pulmonary adenocarcinomas before surgery, especially in cases of subcentimeter cancers, would be clinically important and could provide guidance to clinical decision making. In this study, we developed a deep learning system based on 3D convolutional neural networks and multitask learning, which automatically predicts tumor invasiveness, together with 3D nodule segmentation masks. The system processes a 3D nodule-centered patch of preprocessed CT and learns a deep representation of a given nodule without the need for any additional information. A dataset of 651 nodules with manually segmented voxel-wise masks and pathological labels of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma (IA) was used in this study. We trained and validated our deep learning system on 523 nodules and tested its performance on 128 nodules. An observer study with 2 groups of radiologists, 2 senior and 2 junior, was also investigated. We merged AAH and AIS into one single category AAH-AIS, comprising a 3-category classification in our study. The proposed deep learning system achieved better classification performance than the radiologists; in terms of 3-class weighted average F1 score, the model achieved 63.3% while the radiologists achieved 55.6%, 56.6%, 54.3%, and 51.0%, respectively. These results suggest that deep learning methods improve the yield of discriminative results and hold promise in the CADx application domain, which could help doctors work efficiently and facilitate the application of precision medicine. Significance: Machine learning tools are beginning to be implemented for clinical applications. This study represents an important milestone for this emerging technology, which could improve therapy selection for patients with lung cancer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI represents a promising solution for reducing observational variability and supporting more consistent staging practices.
“Minimizing observational variability is essential, and AI represents a promising solution for reducing such errors and supporting more consistent staging practices [41].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncologic Thoracic Surgery: Clinical Decision Support and Emerging Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [41]
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 56,035 · see citing works
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707 · see citing works
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362 · see citing works
Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Dataset
Carreira, J., & Zisserman, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.502 · Cited by 9,570 · see citing works
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408 · see citing works
Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
Gillies, R. J., Kinahan, P. E., & Hricak, H. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151169 · Cited by 8,421 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, X., Faes, L., Kale, A. U., Wagner, S. K., Fu, D. J., Bruynseels, A., Mahendiran, T., Moraes, G., Shamdas, M., Kern, C., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30123-2 · Cited by 1,883 · see citing works
The Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Practice
Karalis, V. D. (2024) · Applied Biosciences · doi:10.3390/applbiosci3010002 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
The impact of ChatGPT and LLMs on medical imaging stakeholders: Perspectives and use cases
Yang, J., Li, H. B., & Wei, D. (2023) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100007 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationPetrella, F., & Rizzo, S. (2026) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers18020246 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhao, W., Yang, J., Sun, Y., Li, C., Wu, W., Jin, L., Yang, Z., Ni, B., Gao, P., Wang, P., Hua, Y., & Li, M.
- Affiliations
- 1Department of Radiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
- 3Department of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
- 6Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
- ORCID
- Jin, Liang
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2018-12-13
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 6881-6889
- ISSN
- 0008-5472
- 1538-7445
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Shanghai Hospital Development Center (SHDC22015025)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0112800, 2017YFC0112905)
- National Science Foundation of China (61502301)
- Health Commission of Shanghai (2018ZHYL0103)
- STCSM (17511105401, 18DZ2270700)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review