A Human Organotypic Microfluidic Tumor Model Permits Investigation of the Interplay between Patient-Derived Fibroblasts and Breast Cancer Cells
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Tumor–stroma interactions significantly influence cancer cell metastasis and disease progression. These interactions are partly comprised of the cross-talk between tumor and stromal fibroblasts, but the key molecular mechanisms within the cross-talk that govern cancer invasion are still unclear. Here, we adapted our previously developed microfluidic device as a 3D in vitro organotypic model to mechanistically study tumor–stroma interactions by mimicking the spatial organization of the tumor microenvironment on a chip. We cocultured breast cancer and patient-derived fibroblast cells in 3D tumor and stroma regions, respectively, and combined functional assessments, including cancer cell migration, with transcriptome profiling to unveil the molecular influence of tumor–stroma cross-talk on invasion. This led to the observation that cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) enhanced invasion in 3D by inducing expression of a novel gene of interest, glycoprotein nonmetastatic B (GPNMB), in breast cancer cells, resulting in increased migration speed. Importantly, knockdown of GPNMB blunted the influence of CAF on enhanced cancer invasion. Overall, these results demonstrate the ability of our model to recapitulate patient-specific tumor microenvironments to investigate the cellular and molecular consequences of tumor–stroma interactions. Significance: An organotypic model of tumor–stroma interactions on a microfluidic chip reveals that CAFs promote invasion by enhancing expression of GPNMB in breast cancer cells.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a 3D organotypic microfluidic chip, CAFs enhance invasion and migration speed by inducing expression of glycoprotein nonmetastatic B in breast cancer cells.
“In this 3D model, CAFs were shown to enhance invasion and migration speed by inducing expression of a new candidate gene, glycoprotein nonmetastatic B (GPNMB) in breast cancer cells [75].”
From Tumor microenvironment complexity and therapeutic implications at a glance (2020) · cites this paper as [75]
Lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma cells could cross the BBB while liver cancer did not.
“It was demonstrated that lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma cells could cross the BBB while liver cancer did not.[ 146 ]”
From 3D Biomimetic Models to Reconstitute Tumor Microenvironment In Vitro: Spheroids, Organoids, and Tumor‐on‐a‐Chip (2023) · cites this paper as [146]
The Results passage on breast cancer cell invasion describes migration into 3D stroma, not across the blood–brain barrier. Searches for BBB crossing and the claimed comparison with liver cancer found no passage addressing either point in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 149
- Authors
- Truong, D. D., Kratz, A., Park, J. G., Barrientos, E. S., Saini, H., Nguyen, T., Pockaj, B., Mouneimne, G., LaBaer, J., & Nikkhah, M.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- University of Arizona Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nikkhah, Mehdi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2019-06-14
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3139-3151
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- PMC
- PMC6664809
- OpenAlex
- W2938744143
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Cancer Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1510700)
- National Institutes of Health (R01CA196885)
- Breast Cancer Research Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Keywords
- tumor-stroma interactions, cancer-associated fibroblasts, breast cancer, 3D tumor microenvironment, tumor invasion, tumor cell migration, GPNMB, patient-derived fibroblasts, gene expression profiling
- MeSH terms
- Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts, Breast Neoplasms, Cell Movement, Female, Fibroblasts, Humans, Membrane Glycoproteins, Models, Biological, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Organoids, Coculture Techniques, Gene Expression Profiling, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Tumor Microenvironment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review