Analysis of Tumor-Associated AXIN1 Missense Mutations Identifies Variants That Activate β-Catenin Signaling
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
AXIN1 is a major component of the β-catenin destruction complex and is frequently mutated in various cancer types, particularly liver cancers. Truncating AXIN1 mutations are recognized to encode a defective protein that leads to β-catenin stabilization, but the functional consequences of missense mutations are not well characterized. Here, we first identified the GSK3β, β-catenin, and RGS/APC interaction domains of AXIN1 that are the most critical for proper β-catenin regulation. Analysis of 80 tumor-associated variants in these domains identified 18 that significantly affected β-catenin signaling. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed that most of them lost binding to the binding partner corresponding to the mutated domain. A comprehensive protein structure analysis predicted the consequences of these mutations, which largely overlapped with the observed effects on β-catenin signaling in functional experiments. The structure analysis also predicted that loss-of-function mutations within the RGS/APC interaction domain either directly affected the interface for APC binding or were located within the hydrophobic core and destabilized the entire structure. In addition, truncated AXIN1 length inversely correlated with the β-catenin regulatory function, with longer proteins retaining more functionality. These analyses suggest that all AXIN1-truncating mutations at least partially affect β-catenin regulation, whereas this is only the case for a subset of missense mutations. Consistently, most colorectal and liver cancers carrying missense variants acquire mutations in other β-catenin regulatory genes such as APC and CTNNB1. These results will aid the functional annotation of AXIN1 mutations identified in large-scale sequencing efforts or in individual patients. Significance: Characterization of 80 tumor-associated missense variants of AXIN1 reveals a subset of 18 mutations that disrupt its β-catenin regulatory function, whereas the majority are passenger mutations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Xing, Y., Clements, W. K., Kimelman, D., & Xu, W. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1142603 · Cited by 237 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Five of 15 mutations can be mapped onto the crystal structure between human b -catenin and Xenopus Axin (18).”
InfluentialJi, L., Jiang, B., Jiang, X., Charlat, O., Chen, A., Mickanin, C., Bauer, A., Xu, W., Yan, X., & Cong, F. (2017) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.300053.117 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Critical Scaffolding Regions of the Tumor Suppressor Axin1 Are Natively Unfolded
Noutsou, M., Duarte, A. M. S., Anvarian, Z., Didenko, T., Minde, D. P., Kuper, I., de Ridder, I., Oikonomou, C., Friedler, A., Boelens, R., et al. (2011) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.11.013 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Zhang, R., Li, S., Schippers, K., Li, Y., Eimers, B., Lavrijsen, M., Wang, L., Cui, G., Chen, X., Peppelenbosch, M. P., Lebbink, J. H. G., & Smits, R.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smits, Ron
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2024-02-15
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1443-1459
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- PMC
- PMC11063763
- OpenAlex
- W4391839352
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cancer Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- China Scholarship Council (201808530490, 201909370083)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Signaling Pathways in Disease
- Keywords
- AXIN1, missense mutations, β-catenin signaling, β-catenin destruction complex, protein structure prediction, truncating mutations, liver cancer, colorectal cancer, passenger mutations
- MeSH terms
- Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Protein Binding, Signal Transduction, Mutation, Missense, Cell Line, Tumor, beta Catenin, HEK293 Cells, Axin Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review