The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiology of Male Breast Cancer
Abstract
Breast cancer in men is a rare disease, accounting for ∼1% of all breast cancer cases. Although the epidemiologic literature regarding female breast cancer is extensive, relatively little is known about the etiology of male breast cancer (MBC). This review is intended to summarize the existing body of evidence on genetic and epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer in men. Overall, the epidemiology of MBC presents similarities with the epidemiology of female breast cancer. Major genetic factors associated with an increased risk of breast cancer for men include BRCA2 mutations, which are believed to account for the majority of inherited breast cancer in men, Klinefelter syndrome, and a positive family history. Suspected genetic factors include AR gene mutations, CYP17 polymorphism, Cowden syndrome, and CHEK2. Epidemiologic risk factors for MBC include disorders relating to hormonal imbalances, such as obesity, testicular disorders (e.g., cryptorchidism, mumps orchitis, and orchiectomy), and radiation exposure. Suspected epidemiologic risk factors include prostate cancer,prostate cancer treatment, gynecomastia, occupational exposures (e.g., electromagnetic fields, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and high temperatures), dietary factors (e.g., meat intake and fruit and vegetable consumption), and alcohol intake.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective
Zhou, B.-B. S., & Elledge, S. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35044005 · Cited by 3,213
Molecular mechanism of nucleotide excision repair
de Laat, W. L., Jaspers, N. G. J., & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.7.768 · Cited by 1,122
The CHEK2-Breast Cancer Consortium (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng879 · Cited by 1,104
Wooster, R., Mangion, J., Eeles, R., Smith, S., Dowsett, M., Averill, D., Barrett-Lee, P., Easton, D. F., Ponder, B. A. J., & Stratton, M. R. (1992) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1092-132 · Cited by 250
Androgen receptor gene mutation in male breast cancer.
Lobaccaro, J.-M., Lumbroso, S., Belon, C., Galtier-Dereure, F., Bringer, J., Lesimple, T., Namer, M., Cutull, B. F., Pujol, H., & Sultan, C. (1993) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/2.11.1799 · Cited by 135 · cited 3×
“Alternatively, the role of AR mutations in MBC may relate to the reduction in androgen levels, and subsequent elevated estrogen/androgen activity ratio may promote breast cancer development in men (21, 46, 50).”
Background
Cited by
Endocrine Disruptor Vinclozolin Induced Epigenetic Transgenerational Adult-Onset Disease
Anway, M. D., Leathers, C., & Skinner, M. K. (2006) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2006-0640 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiss, J. R., Moysich, K. B., & Swede, H.
- Venue
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-26
- ISSN
- 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7755
- OpenAlex
- W4292334800
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of Male Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1055-9965.20.14.1
- The paper
- Weiss, J. R., Moysich, K. B., & Swede, H. (2005). Epidemiology of Male Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.20.14.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.