Cited by 370Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningWomen's cancer prevention and management

Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening

Bray, Freddie, Loos, Anja H., McCarron, Peter, Weiderpass, Elizabete, Arbyn, Mark, Møller, Henrik, Hakama, Matti, Parkin, D. Max·2005·Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Abstract

Despite there being sufficient evidence for the effectiveness of screening by cytology in preventing cancer of the cervix uteri, screening policies vary widely among European countries, and incidence is increasing in younger women. This study analyzes trends in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix uteri in 13 European countries to evaluate effectiveness of screening against a background of changing risk. Age-period-cohort models were fitted and period and cohort effects were estimated; these were considered as primarily indicative of screening interventions and changing etiology, respectively. A unique set of estimates was derived by fixing age slopes to one of several plausible age curves under the assumption that the relation between age and cervical cancer incidence is biologically determined. There were period-specific declines in cervical SCC in several countries, with the largest decreases seen in northern Europe. A pattern emerged across Europe of escalating risk in successive generations born after 1930. In the western European countries, a decrease followed by a stabilization of risk by cohort was accompanied by period-specific declines. In southern Europe, stable period, but increasing cohort trends, were observed. Substantial changes have occurred in cervical SCC incidence in Europe and well-organized screening programs have been highly effective in reducing the incidence of cervical SCC. Screening and changing sexual mores largely explain the changing perio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-04-0569

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bray, F., Loos, A. H., McCarron, P., Weiderpass, E., Arbyn, M., Møller, H., Hakama, M., & Parkin, D. M.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • 1International Agency for Research Cancer, Lyon, France;
  • Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique (BE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Tampere University (FI)
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2005-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
677-686
ISSN
  • 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7755
OpenAlex
W2151780198
Cited by
370
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
cervical squamous cell carcinoma, cervical cancer incidence trends, cervical cancer screening, cytology screening, screening effectiveness, age-period-cohort analysis, cohort effects, period effects, opportunistic screening, young women, Europe
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Europe, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review