Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening
Abstract
Despite there being sufficient evidence for the effectiveness of screening by cytology in preventing cancer of the cervix uteri, screening policies vary widely among European countries, and incidence is increasing in younger women. This study analyzes trends in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix uteri in 13 European countries to evaluate effectiveness of screening against a background of changing risk. Age-period-cohort models were fitted and period and cohort effects were estimated; these were considered as primarily indicative of screening interventions and changing etiology, respectively. A unique set of estimates was derived by fixing age slopes to one of several plausible age curves under the assumption that the relation between age and cervical cancer incidence is biologically determined. There were period-specific declines in cervical SCC in several countries, with the largest decreases seen in northern Europe. A pattern emerged across Europe of escalating risk in successive generations born after 1930. In the western European countries, a decrease followed by a stabilization of risk by cohort was accompanied by period-specific declines. In southern Europe, stable period, but increasing cohort trends, were observed. Substantial changes have occurred in cervical SCC incidence in Europe and well-organized screening programs have been highly effective in reducing the incidence of cervical SCC. Screening and changing sexual mores largely explain the changing perio…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Population-based cervical cancer screening is effective, as shown by sharp declines in age-standardised cervical cancer incidence in high-income countries following implementation of cytology-based screening.
“The effectiveness of population-based cervical cancer screening has also been shown, through the sharp declines in age-standardised cervical cancer incidence in high-income countries following the implementation of cytology-based screening.12, 13”
Cites
Cancer Incidence in Five Continents
(1966) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85849-9 · Cited by 5,936 · see citing works
Persistent Human Papillomavirus Infection as a Predictor of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Schlecht, N. F. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.24.3106 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21660 · Cited by 108,699 · see citing works
Self-citationBray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21492 · Cited by 84,109 · see citing works
Self-citationBray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Soerjomataram, I., & Jemal, A. (2024) · CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21834 · Cited by 27,064 · see citing works
Self-citationBrisson, M., Kim, J. J., Canfell, K., Drolet, M., Gingras, G., Burger, E. A., Martin, D., Simms, K. T., Bénard, É., Boily, M.-C., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30068-4 · Cited by 943 · see citing works
Self-citationArbyn, M., Smith, S. B., Temin, S., Sultana, F., & Castle, P. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k4823 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
Self-citationFesenfeld, M., Hutubessy, R., & Jit, M. (2013) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.060 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Importance of Cytopathologic Diagnosis in Early Cancer Diagnosis in Resource-Constrained Countries
Yadav, K., Cree, I., Field, A., Vielh, P., & Mehrotra, R. (2022) · JCO Global Oncology · doi:10.1200/go.21.00337 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Role of cytopathology in cancer control in low-resource settings: sub-Saharan Africa's perspective
Thomas, J. (2011) · International Health · doi:10.1016/j.inhe.2010.09.002 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bray, F., Loos, A. H., McCarron, P., Weiderpass, E., Arbyn, M., Møller, H., Hakama, M., & Parkin, D. M.
- Affiliations
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- 1International Agency for Research Cancer, Lyon, France;
- Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique (BE)
- King's College London (GB)
- Tampere University (FI)
- Venue
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Published
- 2005-03-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 677-686
- ISSN
- 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2151780198
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 12.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- cervical squamous cell carcinoma, cervical cancer incidence trends, cervical cancer screening, cytology screening, screening effectiveness, age-period-cohort analysis, cohort effects, period effects, opportunistic screening, young women, Europe
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Europe, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Incidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review