The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differences in Survival by Histologic Type of Pancreatic Cancer
Abstract
Objective: Although pancreatic cancer has an extremely high case fatality rate, little is known about differences in mortality by histologic types. We examined median survival and risk of mortality for endocrine pancreatic tumors and two types of exocrine tumors, adenocarcinomas, and mucinous tumors. Method: This analysis included 35,276 pancreatic cancer cases reported to the nine population-based cancer registries participating in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program from 1973 to 2000. Survival among cases with pancreatic adenocarcinomas, mucinous tumors, and endocrine tumors were compared using Kaplan-Meier plots. Comparative risks of mortality were evaluated using multivariate adjusted Cox regression models. Results: Endocrine pancreatic cancer cases had a median survival of 27 months compared with a median survival of 4 months for adenocarcinoma and mucinous tumor cases. Compared with adenocarcinoma cases, endocrine tumor cases had a 0.28-fold lower risk of mortality [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.26-0.30], and mucinous tumor cases had a 0.88-fold lower risk (95% CI, 0.84-0.91). These results were similar for men and women. Within histologic types, advanced tumor stage, older diagnosis age, surgery, and Black race were associated with increased risks of mortality, whereas female sex and more recent year of diagnosis were associated with decreased risks. Conclusion: This study confirms the clinical observation that patients with endocrine pancreatic cancer survive longer than patients with exocrine tumors. A better understanding of these differences could contribute to identifying the underlying causes of pancreatic cancer and to improving survival rates across all histologic types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver
Costa-Silva, B., Aiello, N. M., Ocean, A. J., Singh, S., Zhang, H., Thakur, B. K., Becker, A., Hoshino, A., Mark, M. T., Molina, H., et al. (2015) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3169 · Cited by 2,692
Molecular Pathogenesis of Pancreatic Cancer
Grant, T. J., Hua, K., & Singh, A. (2016) · Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science · doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2016.09.008 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Fesinmeyer, M. D., Austin, M. A., Li, C. I., De Roos, A. J., & Bowen, D. J.
- Venue
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Published
- 2005-07-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1766-1773
- ISSN
- 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2060601927
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in Survival by Histologic Type of Pancreatic Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-05-0120
- The paper
- Fesinmeyer, M. D., Austin, M. A., Li, C. I., De Roos, A. J., & Bowen, D. J. (2005). Differences in Survival by Histologic Type of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-05-0120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.